Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
hello MUARBALU sir,
u did very good acting in SATHURANGAM. IT was real fantastic. MAKKUBAI sir, you must know one thing.u must take note that no one other than muarbalu done double role in malaysian telemovie world. some claims that PRANA haridass did it but he actually done double charactor who as father & son in same movie. first half as father. second half son. u must know one thing that what was done by haridass is not dual role. whe i watched PRANA i was upset. but when i saw SATHURANGAM it makes me really happy. muarbalu did double or dual role. it admitts naturally. he act as INS.SHAKTHI & BRAIN BABU. i think tht's the first dual role production in MALAYSIA. Mr.BALU who i knew is a good jounalist in TAMILNESAN daily. i always read articles wrote bye him in tamil nesan. quite some time ago he took charge of EN KELVIKU ENNA BATHIL session in T.NESAN. i do not know why he dropped it. it was fantastic. he answered all over question about tamil,bollywood,hollywood even chinese film in that section. he did well job. basically i'm a cinefan.i have his all answer collection with me.i want to do it as a book than publish it with his permission. but i dont have his contact. if he come to know this idea by reading this forum session i need his approval. pls muarbalu sir. sir, u did well job in SATHURANGAM. dont listen to unnesesarry comments on you. please you go on making movies. in malaysia there are a lot of ur fans looking for upcoming productions from you. so,please dont give up. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
SATHURANGAM IS A ROJAK MOVIE! WE CAN SEE MANIRATNAM, PARTHIPEN, KAMALHASAN, P.VASU AND KS RAVIKUMAR''''S TOUCHES IN SCREENPLAY. MAY BE THE DIRECTOR CRAZE ABOUT THEM? IN THE TECHNICAL WAY IT NEEDS A LOT OF IMPROVEMENT..AT THE SAMAE TIME.. WE CAN APPRECIATE THE MESSAGE THAT TOLD BY DIRECTOR! SATHURANGAM IS MORE BETTER THAN OTHER LOCAL TELEMOVIES THAT ALWAYS GIVING HEADACHE TO US. SUPPORT SATHURANGAM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|