LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-20-2007, 07:12 AM   #1
LottiFurmann

Join Date
Jan 2008
Posts
4,494
Senior Member
Default
http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_90190#

It is possible, it is legal, just costs money for licensing and equipment. Perhaps it is a worthwhile venture, SF Radio, Australia Calling etc. are good shows yet they are just preaching to the converted.

Regards
NoCrusties.
LottiFurmann is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 07:22 AM   #2
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
59
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_90190#

It is possible, it is legal, just costs money for licensing and equipment. Perhaps it is a worthwhile venture, SF Radio, Australia Calling etc. are good shows yet they are just preaching to the converted.

Regards
NoCrusties.
You don't really believe that you would get permission to set up a radio station, do you?
Peptobismol is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 07:22 AM   #3
tgs

Join Date
Mar 2007
Age
48
Posts
5,125
Senior Member
Default
All sounds good, maybe the Government will give us a grant to start it?
tgs is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 07:31 AM   #4
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
59
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
All sounds good, maybe the Government will give us a grant to start it?
Yeah, they may provide ASIO resources to protect it from commies too!
Peptobismol is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 07:38 AM   #5
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
All sounds good, maybe the Government will give us a grant to start it?
If we all claim to be 1/16th abo, we should get a few million for it
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 07:45 AM   #6
doctorzlo

Join Date
Jun 2006
Posts
4,488
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, they may provide ASIO resources to protect it from commies too!
May confuse them, you would have the Left Wing ASIO specialists fighting with the ASIO Patriot specialists. Not to mention the Muslim ASIO specialists would get cranky because they missed all the attention. Then you would have the AFP all upset because funding would be cut so they could not pay Nick to protect the corrupt members of Parliament.

Confused? See what I mean
doctorzlo is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 07:53 AM   #7
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
As far as I know we have a right to free and uncontrolled media, we also cannot be discriminated against on grounds of politics. It will be financially and physically costing and I doubt it's viable at this point in time but I'm just letting the idea float around for debate.

If a mass movement can be produced out of recent events, either through New Right, the APP or any other vehicle, it would become very possible and a damn good idea to have a mainstream radio station.

Regards
NoCrusties.
softy54534 is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 08:01 AM   #8
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
As far as I know we have a right to free and uncontrolled media, we also cannot be discriminated against on grounds of politics.

Regards
NoCrusties.
Well mate hate to tell ya, unless you are taking the piss old Bob Hawk and Whitlam made sure that these rights are now under the control of ZOG. So unless you are supporting what they want you have no rights. This is what the white mans battle is all about. Our right to speak out against the crimes committed everyday against us.
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 08:24 AM   #9
NeroASERCH

Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
5,147
Senior Member
Default
Well mate hate to tell ya, unless you are taking the piss old Bob Hawk and Whitlam made sure that these rights are now under the control of ZOG. So unless you are supporting what they want you have no rights. This is what the white mans battle is all about. Our right to speak out against the crimes committed everyday against us.
Well that's why I said "As far as I know," what are these laws? I'm completely oblivious to them...

Regards
NoCrusties.
NeroASERCH is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 08:40 AM   #10
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
59
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
Well that's why I said "As far as I know," what are these laws? I'm completely oblivious to them...

Regards
NoCrusties.
Well "these laws" aren’t exactly written. You can try the Australia Act 1982?? Bob Hawk. But if you would like to read up on the pre Bob Hawk Australian Constitution and the Magna Carter you will see what we have lost. This is why it is imperative to force Australia to become a republic. This way the Legal team owned and run by ZOG can make sure they write a few extra laws into the new constitution to totally silence us evil white folk.
PhillipHer is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 04:41 PM   #11
Drugmachine

Join Date
Apr 2006
Posts
4,490
Senior Member
Default
As far as I know we have a right to free and uncontrolled media, we also cannot be discriminated against on grounds of politics. It will be financially and physically costing and I doubt it's viable at this point in time but I'm just letting the idea float around for debate.

If a mass movement can be produced out of recent events, either through New Right, the APP or any other vehicle, it would become very possible and a damn good idea to have a mainstream radio station.

Regards
NoCrusties.
What planet have you been living on?
First, there is no such thing as a 'right'.
A so-called 'right' is granted by law. Law can be changed.
Australia does not have a bill of rights as part of the constitution.
We are guaranteed NOTHING.
In Wodanist teaching, an individual is entitled to only what they are strong enough to take and hold.
'Rights' are the same.
There is no free media in Australia. There never has been.
Trust me on this. I have worked in newspapers and magazines my whole working life.
I shall deal with radio, since that is the topic of the thread.
To start a radio station you have to get a licence from the Federal Government.
These licences are sold for millions of dollars and come with a list of conditions.
These include a government regulator having control over what is broadcast.
Anything that is classified as 'hate' (aka, anything that is remotely truthful about the differences between the races and/or which is critical of non-white immigration) is forbidden.
If you breach the conditions of the licence, you lose the licence and the millions of dollars that you paid for it.
Same story with television.
Newspapers and magazines are also licensed by the Federal Government.
You have to face the fact that the mainstream media is a closed shop that is 100% controlled by Jewry through ownership and then through the regulatory processes put in place by their political puppets.
Drugmachine is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 10:13 PM   #12
Paul Bunyan

Join Date
Jul 2007
Age
59
Posts
4,495
Senior Member
Default
What planet have you been living on?
First, there is no such thing as a 'right'.
A so-called 'right' is granted by law. Law can be changed.
Australia does not have a bill of rights as part of the constitution.
We are guaranteed NOTHING.
In Wodanist teaching, an individual is entitled to only what they are strong enough to take and hold.
'Rights' are the same.
There is no free media in Australia. There never has been.
Trust me on this. I have worked in newspapers and magazines my whole working life.
I shall deal with radio, since that is the topic of the thread.
To start a radio station you have to get a licence from the Federal Government.
These licences are sold for millions of dollars and come with a list of conditions.
These include a government regulator having control over what is broadcast.
Anything that is classified as 'hate' (aka, anything that is remotely truthful about the differences between the races and/or which is critical of non-white immigration) is forbidden.
If you breach the conditions of the licence, you lose the licence and the millions of dollars that you paid for it.
Same story with television.
Newspapers and magazines are also licensed by the Federal Government.
You have to face the fact that the mainstream media is a closed shop that is 100% controlled by Jewry through ownership and then through the regulatory processes put in place by their political puppets.
There we go, debate finished.

Good to see we have a like Wodensvolk to set the story straight. I knew conditions were bad but I have no real knowledge of commercial media, so I'm pretty suprised it is so bad.

Thanks Wodensvolk.

Regards
NoCrusties.
Paul Bunyan is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 10:37 PM   #13
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
I'm quit concerned you are "surprised it is so bad". That statement is a major insult to the intelligence of White Nationalists!
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 11:13 PM   #14
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
There we go, debate finished.

Good to see we have a like Wodensvolk to set the story straight. I knew conditions were bad but I have no real knowledge of commercial media, so I'm pretty suprised it is so bad.

Thanks Wodensvolk.

Regards
NoCrusties.
I would love to set up a white radio station, but it would have to be pirate and given the sophistication of modern direction-finding equipment we would not last the first shift until a team of armed feds dressed in black kicked in the door.
I used to be a 27mHz CB pirate back in the 1970s. Been there, done that . . . and back then the radio inspectors did not have a bug up their arses from the multicultural thought police.
If we somehow managed to find a ship to do it from outside Australian territorial waters the feds would jam the signal, then prosecute all the advertisers as accessories to a crime (breach of the telecommunications legislation).
The first time that we came into port to reprovision the ship we would all be dragged off in chains.
RAN divers might also do a Rainbow Warrior on the ship, quite possibly while it was on station outside Australian territorial waters.
The Jews would also bring unbearable commercial pressure to bear upon all advertisers to cease their financial support of the radio station.
I hate to say it, but in terms of establishing our own broadcast media in Australia we are screwed.
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 11:27 PM   #15
9mm_fan

Join Date
May 2007
Age
54
Posts
5,191
Senior Member
Default
I'm quit concerned you are "surprised it is so bad". That statement is a major insult to the intelligence of White Nationalists!
You have a point. But I would wager he is busy researching this fact.
9mm_fan is offline


Old 09-20-2007, 11:40 PM   #16
Ifroham4

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,196
Senior Member
Default
What planet have you been living on?
First, there is no such thing as a 'right'.
A so-called 'right' is granted by law. Law can be changed.
Australia does not have a bill of rights as part of the constitution.
We are guaranteed NOTHING.
In Wodanist teaching, an individual is entitled to only what they are strong enough to take and hold.
'Rights' are the same.
There is no free media in Australia. There never has been.
Trust me on this. I have worked in newspapers and magazines my whole working life.
I shall deal with radio, since that is the topic of the thread.
To start a radio station you have to get a licence from the Federal Government.
These licences are sold for millions of dollars and come with a list of conditions.
These include a government regulator having control over what is broadcast.
Anything that is classified as 'hate' (aka, anything that is remotely truthful about the differences between the races and/or which is critical of non-white immigration) is forbidden.
If you breach the conditions of the licence, you lose the licence and the millions of dollars that you paid for it.
Same story with television.
Newspapers and magazines are also licensed by the Federal Government.
You have to face the fact that the mainstream media is a closed shop that is 100% controlled by Jewry through ownership and then through the regulatory processes put in place by their political puppets.
Wodensvolk, me old banana, let me correct you in a few places. Rights are not given by parliament, that is a privilege. Rights are above parliament. Read the declaration of independance of the US for clarification.
Secondly, we DO have a bill of rights. The 1688 bill of rights of the UK is part of our law and has been used as recently as 1995 by the ex premier of WA, Carmen (Bulldyke) Lawrence in a defamation case where she was a defendant. However, it is mainly about the rights of parliament, not the people. I believe that the bill is ultra vires as it is actually a contract between parliament and the Prince of Orange, purporting to allow parliament control over the monarch.
As for the Odinist teaching, I like that. I can agree with that.
Ifroham4 is offline


Old 09-21-2007, 12:15 AM   #17
S.T.D.

Join Date
May 2008
Age
43
Posts
5,220
Senior Member
Default
Wodensvolk, me old banana, let me correct you in a few places. Rights are not given by parliament, that is a privilege. Rights are above parliament. Read the declaration of independance of the US for clarification.
Secondly, we DO have a bill of rights. The 1688 bill of rights of the UK is part of our law and has been used as recently as 1995 by the ex premier of WA, Carmen (Bulldyke) Lawrence in a defamation case where she was a defendant. However, it is mainly about the rights of parliament, not the people. I believe that the bill is ultra vires as it is actually a contract between parliament and the Prince of Orange, purporting to allow parliament control over the monarch.
As for the Odinist teaching, I like that. I can agree with that.
Greetings and heil oh Sith lord,
On the subject of 'rights' we are talking about the same thing. I was trying to explain it in a simple way.
Australia does not have a bill of rights, as found in the US constitution.
Ergo, we have no 'rights' in Australia.
That is an interesting piece of information about Carmen Lawrence. I am not familiar with the case.
I find it interesting that she should choose that defence after the Federal Parliament severed our link (illegally, IMHO) with Magna Carta.
I would have thought that such an act would have severed our links with all such British legislation.
Interesting.
S.T.D. is offline


Old 09-21-2007, 12:17 AM   #18
S.T.D.

Join Date
May 2008
Age
43
Posts
5,220
Senior Member
Default
On 1 July 2005 the Australian Communications & Media Authority (ACMA) was formed by the merger of the Australian Communications Authority (ACA) and the Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA).

ACMA, along with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is responsible for regulating the broadcasting industry, the Internet, the telecommunications industry and the radiocommunications industry.
23. (1) A person shall not, without reasonable excuse, operate, or have in his possession for the purpose of operation, a radiocommunications transmitter except in accordance with a transmitter licence or a temporary permit.
Penalty: $2,000 or imprisonment for 12 months.
So even having the equipment for a pirate radio is illegal.

(d) a condition that the holder of the licence shall not operate, or permit the operation of, the transmitter in such a manner as would be likely to cause reasonable persons, justifiably in all the circumstances, to be seriously alarmed or seriously affronted, or for the purposes of harassing a
person;
This of course can be interpreted as any form of harrasment or discrimination, criticism of Islam or Homosexuals, anything race-related etc.

14. (1) The Minister may, in his discretion, by notice in writing served on the holder of a compliance statement certificate, cancel the certificate.
In effect, proof that Wodensvolk is right, we have no right to media, we are allowed on the air for as long as the Minister gives us permission to be on the air.

28. Indicate the community interest within the licence area that the applicant represents, for example general community, youth, Christian, Islamic, Indigenous, gay and lesbian.

29. (i) Describe the community that the proposed service is intended to serve. Please provide as much detail as possible about the nature and diversity of that community.
They'd take one look at our application and throw it out the window, you also need to provide some personal information regarding presenters and anybody remotely involved in broadcasting.

Basically, as Wodensvolk said, we have Buckleys chance of ever being accepted or being able to maintain a mainstream radio station in any way. Anything said that can remotely be portrayed as "racist" will end with our show being turned off and every participants details leaking to the Reds and the System.

I'm yet to find out pricing but frankly, I don't think it's even worth looking up...

Regards
NoCrusties.
S.T.D. is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity