Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
I think the centers are really the biggest difference talent wise. And while the '92 team had some nice size, I still think the biggest difference was Jordan. Back then, in his prime...LeBron isn't that type of player, and Kobe at his best never got to that level. Pippen on LeBron and Jordan on Kobe would be very tough matchups for the current team's top players. But, if the current team went small, ran out a lineup of Paul, Kobe, LeBron, Durant, and Chandler, I think they could score well on the original team, as Stockton and Magic would struggle staying in front of Paul, and one of the of the wing players would be able to take advantage of Barkley or Malone in transition and on the perimeter. Chandler could just sit in the pain and try to block shots, or try for lobs. Maybe the NBA should look at this as a way to make the All Star game more interesting...following the NHL, of all things. US Born All-Stars versus a World Squad. Something like Howard, Durant, LeBron, Kobe, and Paul versus some combination of The Brothers Gasol, Dirk, Horford, Tony Parker, Manu, Gallinari, Deng, Rubio, Boozer, Kyrie Irving etc. would be interesting. I'd think the international players at least would play with an edge. And I learned something today...I had no idea that the original Dream Team had a player born in Jamaica on it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
I'm not sure what that has to do with the talent on the current team being better than the talent on a team that did, in fact, beat the Dream Team. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
that's great except the dream team could just decide not to play bird or stockton. although you underestimate stockton. they could just as easily have pippen or jordan handle all ball handling responsibilities. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
We also forget that Magic and Bird weren't what they used to be at that point either. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
We also forget that Magic and Bird weren't what they used to be at that point either. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
LOL!! I saw Charles play at least 40 times live and one of the great joys of watching Charles in his prime was him in transition. Seriously, he would kill those guys on both ends of the court on the fly. Unless we are talking about the EA Dream Team version of him, where he can dunk from the top of the key no matter who is in front of him. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
LOL!! I saw Charles play at least 40 times live and one of the great joys of watching Charles in his prime was him in transition. Seriously, he would kill those guys on the fly. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Transition defense? Against a guy faster, taller, and more skilled? I'm not seeing it, man. At least not from '92 Charles. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Transition defense? Against a guy faster, taller, and more skilled? I'm not seeing it, man. At least not from '92 Charles. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
anything they would get in transition they would give right back in the halfcourt to barkley, malone, robinson, and ewing. not to mention in order to get out in transition you genreally need to come up with steals or force contested missed shots. outside of lebron and maybe kobe, there's not too many guys on the current team who are defensive stalwarts, chandler excluded of course because that's the only reason he's on the team. but really, he's not stopping robinson or ewing. But yes, they would struggle defensively against the '92 team. A high scoring shoot out. And really, if someone on the current team got really hot while someone on the old team was cold...In one game, anything could happen. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Paul would have some opportunities to gamble and get steals, I would think. Even in a halfcourt set, having Durant or LeBron run Malone or Barkley around without the ball would be an advantage. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests) | |
|