Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
from post #22 Only the sense of separation, (ignorance) of the universe(s) create the sense of separateness,that in turn leads to fear of death.The really interesting question is why do we fear death? To keep themselves in an imaginary positions of power our leaders,(church,secular) lie. I would suggest the only way out of this mess is to see the world for ourselves, to see pass the self-serving trash. Oppps sorry for that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
energy cannot be destroyed,so nothing dies,nothing is born Oppps sorry for that. Let's all try to keep this sort of aversion curtailed, here and elsewhere. The Buddha says compassion ends hatred, nothing else. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
I think this is where Buddhist philosophy takes the middle path between ninilism and eternalism. Most types of thinking are either/or; they exclude the possibility of a middle ground in which answers can be both-yes-and-no, neither-yes-nor-no at the same time. That which comes into existence with the birth of an organism is a new chain of related phenomena, not exactly a 'true' being in and of itself as beings are commonly conceived of. The 'being' that comes into existence is a mere conventional being, not a fundamental entity with an identity that survives over time. So, yes, 'something' comes into existence at birth, but no, it's not a true entity, only a conventional one, a convenient fiction.
Or I may be wrong about that. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
I would suggest that in an absolute manner nothing dies,it may change it's appearance but the energy that is life continues in another form. One of the big diferences between eatern and western understandings is about this. Western view of life has the tendency toward "linearity" so there is a psychological need to set orign and end; eastern view tends to be cyclical so there is no so much worrie about endings and beginings. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
from post #28 The consciousness answer also falls prey to Heraclitis' observation that you can't step into the same river twice. Neither the person nor the river is the same entity from moment to moment. Then there's the Ship of Theseus argument, which is closely related. I don't see how consciousness can be a thing. I'm trying to remember where I read a sutta quote that I can right now only paraphrase. In it, the Buddha says something like, 'I see action and volition, but no being/entity that passes on from moment to moment.' |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
Death is possible only if you believe in the fundamental reality of entities, which is something that Buddhist philosophy has shown to be fallacious. As far as I can tell, nothing ever stops, ends, dies, disappears in an ultimate sense, and this is closely related to the observation that the conventional concept of existent things (entities) is deeply flawed.
As always, I could be wrong about this. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
from post #36 Also I don't think that the mind of an enlightened being comes to a total standstill, otherwise how would he/she calculate and pay for an electricity bill or function in day to day living in general ? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
from post #38 PS If you'd like to introduce yourself to the group, you're very welcome to do so on the introductions and welcome thread for new members here: URL |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|