LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-01-2010, 08:18 PM   #21
dgdhgjjgj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
Hard to say what happens after death. All we know is that the physical body remains and eventually decays. People fear death because they are in delusion of a self. The delusion that "they" die.
dgdhgjjgj is offline


Old 05-02-2010, 12:41 PM   #22
TughEmotteTug

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
Death. A few days ago, this thought came to me. Everything in the universe is, as far as we can tell, 13.7 billion years old, more or less. What new being is created when a child is born? What ceases to exist when a body ceases to function?
TughEmotteTug is offline


Old 05-02-2010, 12:56 PM   #23
Sxedlawb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
from post #22
As far as science has got at the moment we think that energy cannot be destroyed,so nothing dies,nothing is born.
Only the sense of separation, (ignorance) of the universe(s) create the sense of separateness,that in turn leads to fear of death.The really interesting question is why do we fear death?
To keep themselves in an imaginary positions of power our leaders,(church,secular) lie.
I would suggest the only way out of this mess is to see the world for ourselves, to see pass the self-serving trash.
Oppps sorry for that.
Sxedlawb is offline


Old 05-03-2010, 01:38 AM   #24
Reatclaplen

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
361
Senior Member
Default
energy cannot be destroyed,so nothing dies,nothing is born
This isn't what science says, precisely, but it doesn't matter so much as that things do die, things are born - not only does science agree that things come into and pass out of existence, forms of energy notwithstanding, I also recall here the 11th and 12th steps of paticcasamuppada.

Oppps sorry for that.
This should probably have resulted in editing your post of the animosity before hitting 'post', rather than simply typing this just to mention you were aware you should edit, but would rather say it anyway.

Let's all try to keep this sort of aversion curtailed, here and elsewhere. The Buddha says compassion ends hatred, nothing else.
Reatclaplen is offline


Old 05-03-2010, 11:39 AM   #25
swwatch

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
as that things do die, things are born
I would suggest that in an absolute manner nothing dies,it may change it's appearance but the energy that is life continues in another form.
swwatch is offline


Old 05-03-2010, 02:24 PM   #26
MightyMasc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
I think this is where Buddhist philosophy takes the middle path between ninilism and eternalism. Most types of thinking are either/or; they exclude the possibility of a middle ground in which answers can be both-yes-and-no, neither-yes-nor-no at the same time. That which comes into existence with the birth of an organism is a new chain of related phenomena, not exactly a 'true' being in and of itself as beings are commonly conceived of. The 'being' that comes into existence is a mere conventional being, not a fundamental entity with an identity that survives over time. So, yes, 'something' comes into existence at birth, but no, it's not a true entity, only a conventional one, a convenient fiction.

Or I may be wrong about that.
MightyMasc is offline


Old 05-03-2010, 08:59 PM   #27
Preorbtat

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
What ceases to exist when a body ceases to function?
Consciousness
Preorbtat is offline


Old 05-03-2010, 09:00 PM   #28
FUNALA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
I would suggest that in an absolute manner nothing dies,it may change it's appearance but the energy that is life continues in another form.
I can agree with this. Things manifest and cease to manifest due to cause and conditions. Energy known as "prana" is always there and the manifestation is rulled by the law of cyclic manifestation. All in the universe is subject to this periodic patterns; some are small, others big.

One of the big diferences between eatern and western understandings is about this. Western view of life has the tendency toward "linearity" so there is a psychological need to set orign and end; eastern view tends to be cyclical so there is no so much worrie about endings and beginings.

FUNALA is offline


Old 05-03-2010, 11:09 PM   #29
Vjwkvkoy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
from post #28
Is 'consciousness' anything more than an abstract label used to refer to an impersonal flow of phenomena? Conventionally, entities have consciousness. That is, consciousness is said to be an aspect of an entity. Without an entity, what is consciousness?

The consciousness answer also falls prey to Heraclitis' observation that you can't step into the same river twice. Neither the person nor the river is the same entity from moment to moment. Then there's the Ship of Theseus argument, which is closely related. I don't see how consciousness can be a thing.

I'm trying to remember where I read a sutta quote that I can right now only paraphrase. In it, the Buddha says something like, 'I see action and volition, but no being/entity that passes on from moment to moment.'
Vjwkvkoy is offline


Old 05-04-2010, 02:24 PM   #30
Haibundadam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
Death is natural law.
Unavoidable and kind of attachment to live, that's why people fear it.
Death never ends, it's samsara and a circle to be born and die and reborn, again and again without ends, except for the enlightened one.
Haibundadam is offline


Old 05-04-2010, 05:33 PM   #31
ibiDb4uu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
from post #31
Personally l think it's a mistake to think in terms of circles when discussing events,if we think about it then we can see that the form is spiral.
As Fbm (#30) has said we can't step in the same river twice. Failure to appreciate this means we are bound to think in a linear manner.
ibiDb4uu is offline


Old 05-05-2010, 07:35 PM   #32
Chooriwrocafn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
Death is possible only if you believe in the fundamental reality of entities, which is something that Buddhist philosophy has shown to be fallacious. As far as I can tell, nothing ever stops, ends, dies, disappears in an ultimate sense, and this is closely related to the observation that the conventional concept of existent things (entities) is deeply flawed.

As always, I could be wrong about this.
Chooriwrocafn is offline


Old 05-06-2010, 07:38 PM   #33
XinordiX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
isnīt it so that when our unuly minds has come to standstill there ARE NO nor death nor anything
Can you explain further, please Allis. What do you mean when you speak of our minds coming to a standstill ? A blank ?
XinordiX is offline


Old 05-06-2010, 08:04 PM   #34
clubcughSheet

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
from post #36
Its true that a peaceful, settled mind is free from discursive thoughts.... but that's just a preliminary state on the path of practice.

Also I don't think that the mind of an enlightened being comes to a total standstill, otherwise how would he/she calculate and pay for an electricity bill or function in day to day living in general ?
clubcughSheet is offline


Old 05-08-2010, 02:44 PM   #35
dolaBeetCeage

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
675
Senior Member
Default
from post #38
If you mention anything that someone said - whoever it happens to be - could you give a ]http://www.buddhismwithoutboundaries.com/img/smilies/hands.gif[/img]

PS

If you'd like to introduce yourself to the group, you're very welcome to do so on the introductions and welcome thread for new members here: URL
dolaBeetCeage is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity