Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
But then the question might arise, "If not an ontological ethics, then what?"
The Buddha's own ethics was one of reciprocity -- the "Golden Rule", which he espoused quite thoroughly in the Veludvareyya Sutta, the Discourse to the People of Bamboo Gate, SN 55.7, which is available for examination in the pinned "Buddha's Unshakable Ethics" thread in the Beginner's Forum of this group. A portion here: "I will teach you, householders, a Dhamma exposition applicable to oneself. Listen to that and attend closely, I will speak." "Yes, sir," those brahmin householders of Bamboo Gate replied. The Blessed One said this: "What, householders, is the Dhamma exposition applicable to oneself? Here, householders, a noble disciple reflects thus: 'I am one who wishes to live, who does not wish to die; I desire happiness and am averse to suffering. Since I am one who wishes to live, who does not wish to die; who desires happiness and is averse to suffering; if someone were to take my life, that would not be pleasing and agreeable to me. Now if I were to take the life of another -- of one who wishes to live, who does not wish to die, who desires happiness and is averse to suffering--that would not be pleasing and agreeable to the other either. What is displeasing and disagreeable to me is displeasing and disagreeable to the other too. How can I inflict upon another what is displeasing and disagreeable to me?' Having reflected thus, he himself abstains from the destruction of life, exhorts others to abstain from the destruction of life, and speaks in praise of abstinence from the destruction of life. Thus this bodily conduct of his is purified in three respects. ... |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|