[tussinelde]

Buddha is that which is neither one nor the other of a thing, a state or a
conditon. The ancients coined a word for it, calling it "the above oppsite"
In this manner one will gradually get rid oft he habit of gving "things" a name or identifyiing with them.. (German: Das Übergegensätzliche).

Allis

You are using a unique and not-agreed-upon re-definition of "Buddha".

Whatever "ancients" you refer to (much better to cite sources) are certain not the man we call the Buddha, who did not teach any of what you are claiming here. The Buddha certainly and indisputably did use language and "giving things a name" to convey his insights to others, and quite successfullyl.