Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Personally I struggle with this one a bit. If we take the standpoint that Buddha was a great teacher and enlightened does it matter what route or routes we use to achieve the same thing? Is there not a risk here that we end up with sectarianism as is the case in other "religions". We only have to look at the Christian church and the wars caused over the differences between Protestants and catholics and again between varying schools of Islam to name but two.
Surely the message is the message from Buddha and should be interpreted by each of us. As the Buddha himself is alleged to have said, believe nothing unless you experience it for yourself. I am sure there is also a bit about do not believe it just because your teachers tell you it is so. If we follow this how can it matter what path leads you to enlightenment? |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
I've practiced in the Theravadan tradition for 30 years, in the Mahayana/Vajrayana tradition for 25 years, and the Dzogchen tradition for 5 years. My experience is that all the Buddhist traditions are teaching precisely the same thing.
The various paths of awaking and their associated dogmas/methods, though appearing different on the surface, are leading to the exact same realizations. The benefit to practicing in multiple traditions is that the essence comes to the foreground, and the stories/methods recede to the background and become just the tools that they were intended to be without becoming concretizing into belief. The challenge of practicing in multiple traditions is seeing beyond the packages and underneath the cultural accretions - just using the tools and noting results rather than cultivating identity and preference. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
My experience is that all the Buddhist traditions are teaching precisely the same thing. I have ever felt that. I do not seek for differences; I always enjoy when I found similitudes and coincidences. This is why I feel comfortable and seren with the one I have choosen, so I do not fear of other traditions. Thanks, ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
[quote=Allis #26: ]
from post #1 Please try to give references for any quotes you give...for example a ]http://www.buddhismwithoutboundaries.com/img/smilies/grin.gif[/img] I am unsure how your post answers my question #1... ?? |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Replying to Aloka-D: from post #1 "Can we practice with more than one Buddhist tradition - or is it better to choose only one ?" ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
I can only speak for myself. At this stage, I'm not bound to any tradition. But I'm inclined towards Theravada (because of Ajahn Chah, that man is inspiring), and am a little bit weary and confused about brand new traditions that have come about very recently.
I have respect for Zen too, something about their style, that sometimes I personally feel the more institutionalised Theravada "authorities" can learn from (like the story about burning Buddha statues). |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|