LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-18-2011, 05:30 AM   #21
tipokotap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
735
Senior Member
Default
Well they stopped engine development, which was stupid too.
True dat.
tipokotap is offline


Old 03-20-2011, 06:01 AM   #22
Zhgrlpil

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
456
Senior Member
Default
At first glance I must admit that I didn't like the idea. But if you build upon it - by say - mandating that the drivers have to drive for a different team every race - the idea starts to show some merit. Add to that, by replacing points with medals (who could ever understand those numbers anyway) and throw in some random rain and snow storms and you've got a definate winner!

I'm pretty sure that that would get us back pretty close to the original ideal of Formula 1 racing.
Yes! Yes! Add a style championship... best drift, highest and longest air over the curbs, coolest hand gesture at lapped traffic... An oil slick button and bean bag cannon would also give us the authentic F1 experience
Zhgrlpil is offline


Old 03-20-2011, 12:43 PM   #23
Starichok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Wow does this idea suck!
Starichok is offline


Old 03-20-2011, 04:25 PM   #24
gopsbousperie

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
I think Stuart has had enough of a kicking now
gopsbousperie is offline


Old 03-20-2011, 04:59 PM   #25
Lolita Palmer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
531
Senior Member
Default
I don't like the idea... the people before me explained very well why it would not work.
Lolita Palmer is offline


Old 03-20-2011, 06:13 PM   #26
loikrso

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
578
Senior Member
Default
What others have said - the development race through the season is half the fun.

I can see this rule coming in though in the near future - from the same prats that brought us frozen engines and control tyres after all.

The obsession with cost-cutting will be the death of this sport (as a sport), it's most of the way there already. The idea would work only as long as Ferrari have the fastest car, in the event they don't expect an immediate U turn by Berni/Todt, we should all remember the result of the engine reg's, I think it went something like this, X many engines per season and no upgrades, that reg lasted until Ferrari was blowing motors, at that point they were given an engine upgrade waiver.

Regards scaliwag.
loikrso is offline


Old 03-21-2011, 10:19 AM   #27
Starichok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
I think Stuart has had enough of a kicking now
No no dammit! He's on the ground, let's kick him some more!!!!
Starichok is offline


Old 03-21-2011, 04:11 PM   #28
Beedcardabeme

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
424
Senior Member
Default
The idea would work only as long as Ferrari have the fastest car, in the event they don't expect an immediate U turn by Berni/Todt, we should all remember the result of the engine reg's, I think it went something like this, X many engines per season and no upgrades, that reg lasted until Ferrari was blowing motors, at that point they were given an engine upgrade waiver.

Regards scaliwag.
I think the problem is that the FIA have very stringent rules that can never be violiated unless it suits them. It's not just Ferrari but when McLaren, Toyota etc manage to make their engine more reliable and as a consequense, more efficient whereas Renault are allowed to have a couple of free catchup sessions when there is a development freeze on.

You can only innovate when it suits the FIA.
Beedcardabeme is offline


Old 03-21-2011, 06:52 PM   #29
loikrso

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
578
Senior Member
Default
I think the problem is that the FIA have very stringent rules that can never be violiated unless it suits them. It's not just Ferrari but when McLaren, Toyota etc manage to make their engine more reliable and as a consequense, more efficient whereas Renault are allowed to have a couple of free catchup sessions when there is a development freeze on.

You can only innovate when it suits the FIA.
Hi skc, my post was slightly tongue in cheek, however you are of course correct. FIA rules are only adhered to when it suites certain teams to keep the status quo.

By the way do you remember if the Renault waiver came before or after the Ferrari waiver?

Regards scaliwag
loikrso is offline


Old 03-24-2011, 04:03 AM   #30
Azzi_Kahlila

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
658
Senior Member
Default
No no dammit! He's on the ground, let's kick him some more!!!!
The idea he proposed was so monstrously stupid that every kick he takes while on ground, he will have deserved tenfold
Azzi_Kahlila is offline


Old 03-24-2011, 04:08 PM   #31
russianstallian

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
The idea he proposed was so monstrously stupid that every kick he takes while on ground, he will have deserved tenfold
Garry - change your ID to DCI Gene Hunt.......
russianstallian is offline


Old 03-24-2011, 07:12 PM   #32
Sarbrienna

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
377
Senior Member
Default
Well they stopped engine development, which was stupid too.
They still getting extra BHP from the exhaust via acoustics
Sarbrienna is offline


Old 03-25-2011, 04:42 AM   #33
Azzi_Kahlila

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
658
Senior Member
Default
Garry - change your ID to DCI Gene Hunt.......
Having no idea who that is and now having read about him, well, I be damned
Azzi_Kahlila is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity