LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-04-2010, 05:58 PM   #1
Pharmadryg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default Thread in which I make tech predictions
Could Nvidia go into CPU production instead? They aren't getting along with Intel right now.

JM
Pharmadryg is offline


Old 10-04-2010, 06:05 PM   #2
Si8jy8HN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
They would have to go into a non-x86 CPU design (not production, they don't make anything...they're fabless). ARM is a big market right now. But I'm not sure they'd enter the market well, it's already hyper-competitive.

Intel won't license x86 to them.

And I'm not going to say anything about the stock. I don't think it'll perform too well, but I'd have sold a year ago. I'm not sure if it's worth selling now.
Si8jy8HN is offline


Old 10-04-2010, 06:11 PM   #3
indocrew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
497
Senior Member
Default
GPU cluster computing is awesome.

Our currently code, with just a few parts set to use GPUs would prefer to have 10 GPUs per CPU.

It is possible that we could design it to use GPUs even more, only one person has tried and with only one module of code.

I am not sure I would build a cluster without GPUs right now.

JM
indocrew is offline


Old 10-04-2010, 07:11 PM   #4
BashBeissedat

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
The basic code to recognize gestures from a stream of points is something on the order of 1000x faster with OpenCL on a Radeon 5770 (800 stream processors). It's absurdly responsive.
BashBeissedat is offline


Old 10-04-2010, 07:28 PM   #5
Frodogzzz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
I'm very interested to play with AVX in the new Sandy Bridge processors also. It doubles the SIMD throughput on the CPU, upgrading the SSE engines from 128-bit to 256-bit.
Frodogzzz is offline


Old 10-04-2010, 07:58 PM   #6
AntonayPina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions

New features

* The size of the SIMD vector registers is increased from 128-bits XMM registers to 256-bits registers called YMM0 - YMM15. Existing 128-bit instructions use the lower half of the YMM registers. Further extensions to 512 or 1024 bits are expected in the future.
* Non-destructive instructions. The AVX instruction set allows all two-operand XMM instructions to be modified into non-destructive three-operand forms where the destination register is different from both source registers. For example a:=a+b is replaced by c:=a+b so that register a is unchanged after the instruction. AVX does not support non-destructive forms of instructions using general purpose registers (e.g. EAX), but such support may be added in future instruction sets.
* The alignment requirement of SIMD memory operands is relaxed.

Applications

Suitable for floating point-intensive calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications. Increases parallelism and throughput in floating point SIMD calculations. Reduces register load due to the non-destructive instructions.
AntonayPina is offline


Old 10-04-2010, 08:10 PM   #7
Psymoussy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
Still wouldn't want to use integrated GPUs to play games today.
Psymoussy is offline


Old 10-05-2010, 01:06 AM   #8
Laqswrnm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Not very.
Laqswrnm is offline


Old 10-05-2010, 01:36 AM   #9
blankostaroe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
I'm very interested to play with AVX in the new Sandy Bridge processors also. It doubles the SIMD throughput on the CPU, upgrading the SSE engines from 128-bit to 256-bit.
Are AMD's bulldozer specs the same?
blankostaroe is offline


Old 10-05-2010, 01:54 PM   #10
newspetty

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
Are AMD's bulldozer specs the same?
No. They will support AVX, but at half speed. It's still 128-bit.
newspetty is offline


Old 10-05-2010, 05:46 PM   #11
23tommy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
393
Senior Member
Default
The only way they could take over completely is if they become good enough for games.

It also means good things for the PC gaming industry if that happens. Right now the percentage of PCs capable of playing modern games is very small...
23tommy is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity