General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Obviously, it's called Karate Kid to increase market appeal or whatever PR folks call it. Name recognition and all that.
While we're asking questions about movies, can anybody explain Mad Max to me? I mean the original 1979 movie, where Mel Gibson's 21 and looks closer to 17. It says on the Netflix jacket that it's "post-apocalyptic," the kiss-ass documentary on the disc calls it "post-apocalyptic," but to all appearances it takes place in a world barely distinguishable from our own. There's no reference to nuclear war, zombie/virus infestations, or anything else that would qualify as "apocalyptic." The countryside looks normal, the buildings are all intact, there's just one homoerotic biker gang challenging the mildly authoritarian-flavored police, and they get away with it because there are lawyers in this horrid dystopia who get their clients off the hook. They have rule of law, FFS! I got it expecting a silly, overblown weird-society-in-the-desert movie like the two sequels, but instead there's just an hour and ten minutes of drama and disjointed biker shenanigans followed by maybe fifteen minutes of actual vengeful rampage. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Yeah, I saw the two sequels, and I saw the original expecting more of the same. I was thinking maybe the villain would be a transvestite with a colorful name like "Mistress Pain," who rode around on a rainbow scooter killing people with a hybrid sword/power drill. Instead you get "Toecutter," who has a stupid name and hairdo, somewhat less excruciating camp-ness than the Great Humungus, and that's it. Boooring.
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|