[arriftell]

Obama's been very disapppointing re: secrecy.

This is why it was a bad idea to let Bush pull **** like this, even if you loved Dubya.

Wish I said that.

[Golotop]

Yay, another conservative DL. Like we don't have enough of them. At least the others put in some effort.

[irrelaAnnekly]

Into the pile with you. I have a feeling that I'm not going to miss anything.

[sisuarmalmicy]

Obama will be a one term president, he made too many promises he won't be able to keep. At least he prevented Hillary from being president for possibly 8 years

After Obama arraigned to have her arm broken, Hilliary got the messaged not to run again.

[Anaedilla]

What odds would you give? It's pretty hard to be voted out as President in the US once the people have voted you in office, in the 20th Century there were only three Presidents who failed in their re-election bids after winning their original tries (Hoover, Carter, Papa Bush). It's pretty hard to predict general public opinion on the guy as an office-holder after 6 months out of 4 years, so if someone agrees to 1:1 odds I think you've found a sucker.

Welcome to Apolyton! Have you met Slowwhand?

[VowJoyday]

I don't have to, You've dug yourself into the hole already. As you stated, you don't have the understanding of a child.

I posted that Obama ran on a open government platform but doesn't seem to be living up to it.

Fine. Non-issue.

I did not say whether I approved of what he was doing or not, just that this is different then what Obama promised when he was campainging. Yup, the line "I feel sorry for all the suckers that fell for all his snake oil lies." certainly doesn't state your opinion on the situation.


Which makes him the hypocrite, not me. That's a huge leap in logic, but then so was your last sentence. You clearly aren't basing anything in reality.

Then you attacked the repugs which has NOTHING to do with my original post. I addressed the topic of the article. If you don't think that it is part of your original post, then you've lost it. Even Arrian made the exact same comment that I did. So yes, I did "attack" the repugs (conservatives more accurately) for making a big deal out of this now when Bush and Cheney had done it long before. It was a fair comment to make. You, however, couldn't handle it. That's becasue you were silent during Bush's transgressions and are now loudly denouncing these actions under Obama. So, yes, you are a hypocrit in that sense (also, you post after mine had the grammar of a five year old).


I then pointed out partisian politics at work. Fine. Nowhere did I deny that the Dems should support it under Obama.

A concept that you obviously seem to have a problem understanding. This is where your faulty logic and personal bias expose you as a hypocrit. Apparently, you believe that you can read my mind: "Your thinking that it's just one party that does this is Sooooooo naive. Partisian politics is the norm, not the exception. Geeze."

By your own logic, the previous statement that you made, which was a mirror of mine (although extremely poorly written), would have you "thinking it's just one party that does this." Hence, criticizing me for something that you do and believe (by your own logic, mind you) is hypocritical.


Please point out any statement that I made that was hypocritical? Done. See above.

And the waiting continues. As if you weren't petty enough.


The lesson here is that you should just stick with personal attacks. That seems to be all you're good for (although, they are rather lame). And the good thing here is that you've been exposed as the partisan hypocrit that you are. Seriously Rah, you should learn when to shut up.

[mv37afnr]

and to be accused of posting garbled crap from the person that posted;
Rah, in truth, a child could understand what you wrote is priceless.

[UltraSearchs]

and to be accused of posting garbled crap from the person that posted;

is priceless.

Glad to see you are taking the first part of my advice. However, I think the second part would do you better.

[dasneycomrov]

Are you delusional? It's all stated clearly in post #52, with all of your damned quotes.

Rah, if you're not going to address that post and keep pretending that it didn't happen, then you're too pathetic to waste further time on (but not enough to be reminded of this constantly ).

[soydaykam]

I addressed it but you refuse to accept it.

My issue was he campaigned for open governement and he seems to not be consistent about it. Some might think he was breaking a campaign promise. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW, or do you need a child to translate for you again. All the other crap you're saying has NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. Especially your quote. about the snake oil line. That has to do with his campaingn promises, not the activity. Jesus, are you dense.

[TRASIAOREXOLA]

You called me a hypocrite. Totally baseless. I'm still waiting for you to point out why. The snake oil line does not make me a hypocrite. You just can't stand being pwned.

[UHlVExs7]

You called me a hypocrite. Totally baseless. I'm still waiting for you to point out why. The snake oil line does not make me a hypocrite. You just can't stand being pwned.

Oh god, I should have read this more carefully. Let me explain it to you in terms that a 2 year old would understand (and probable cry in response to): NO WHERE IN THE WHOLE ****ING UNIVERSE DID I EVER SAY THAT YOUR SNAKEOIL LINE MAKES YOU A HYPOCRITE, YOU DERANGED LITTLE TWIT.

Got it now?

[DeilMikina]

Fine. Rah, where do you live?

[markkisil]

So, yes, you are a hypocrit in that sense (also, you post after mine had the grammar of a five year old). If I were you, I would learn how to spell before making fun of other's posts.

[nAKMzyBN]

If I were you, I would learn how to spell before making fun of other's posts.

Sure, I'll do it after I'm done charging your quotes a fine.

[Saad Khan]

Fine, it's settled. Let's kiss and make up.

[radikal]

You guys are pussies. I ought to burn both of your houses down.