General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
does this sound a bit pathetic??
every speech should contain the line you were born in the middle of america to the middle class in the middle of the last century let's explicitly own "american" in our programs, the speeches and the values. he doesn't. make this a new american century, the american strategic energy fund. lets use our logo to make some flags we can give out. lets add flag symbols to the backgrounds. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Originally posted by MarkG
does this sound a bit pathetic?? It appears that Mark Penn believes the main of the electorate to be rather conservative in its presidential choice. He believes that the voters will go with the known commodity -- somebody well within their comfort zone that they think they can trust. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign is going negative in its advertising against the expected Democratic nominee, Sen. Barack Obama.
The Wisconsin Advertising Project, a nonpartisan group that monitors and analyzes political advertising, finds that ads aired by McCain and the Republican National Committee are "more negative" than those aired by Obama. Ninety percent of Obama's ads are positive and don't mention McCain. One third of McCain's campaign ads are negative, researchers found. Related News And all of the RNC's ads compare the two candidates, referring to Obama negatively, the research group says. http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/...nst-obama.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Nah, I don't think stronger attacks against Obama would have worked. I think Obama turns fire extremely well, he's like a teflon candidate. You just look stupid afterwards, I think it's going to hurt you more than not, you have to find some hard facts and not try to smear him with nonsense. And Obama has good writers too so .. just better stick to your own thing and try to swing it from your own field rather than try to muddy things up with this one. You have to be extremely clean yourself in order to do it, and Obama is one of the cleanest candidates. Hillary sure doesn't have a clean record. So better just keep quiet IMO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
This is just more evidence that Hilary was, in fact, a lousy executive. Flawed as he is, Obama was the better choice; he assembled a smart team that could work together in a disciplined fashion, understand obstacles, and react quickly and effectively to unexpected events. It seems to me that that's what you want in a president -- better, certainly, that someone who surrounds herself with sycophants and bickering egomaniacs she can't control.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Incidentally, Lieberman recently said that Obama isn't "putting America first," and the McCain campaign endorsed his claim...
So yeah, I think it's safe to say that McCain's going to run a campaign largely based on vicious jingoism (see, i.e. his emphasis on Hamas' supposed endorsement of Obama). On the upside, in the process he's going to permanently **** his brand and have trouble getting re-elected to the Senate in two years. ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|