General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
What harm would be done to the economy if:
a) These banks were forced to stop lending nearly at all due to overly low cash-on-hand levels? b) These banks went bankrupt? If 'none' or 'relatively little' is the answer, then definitely no bail-out. If 'lots', then something needs to happen to protect the 'little guys', no? I'd be fine with something that massively penalized these banks ... Perhaps nationalizing any bank that is going to go under as a result ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Do not bail out the banks, do not go out to avoid recession, Japan tried that in the 80's and 90's and stagnated for 15 years or so. Let the problems work their way through the system, and many of the imbalances in the American economy will reduce. A short recession that will result will allow sustained growth in the years to come.
Also elect a government and president who will control the deficit better than those you've had recently. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|