[k5wTvu9f]

Guest in this following podcast is Clint Richardson of the docu' The Corporation Nation:

Posted this in the Apple/Geo-fence thread, but really deserves its own... here as we approach 9/11 + 11 (some sort of occult numerology meaning there I'm sure, & 9/11/12 is on a Tuesday this year, just like 9/11/01). Clint contends that the "Truth Movement's" call for "justice for the real 9/11 perps" is misguided, coz gummit ("U.S. CODE") has cleverly codified that they can do whatever they want (incl. TERRORISM) and it's all "legal".

Clint Richardson's blog, worth a browse,
http://realitybloger.wordpress.com

Only a minority of the discussion is re 9/11; most is debunking a lot of myths about the Constitution & our "rights".

The 9/11 Interview You Need To Hear


Terrorism as defined in U.S. CODE is legal for the U.S. Government.

Listen

Download

Show-page

The 9/11 Interview You Need To Hear

What would you say if I told you that if… IF you proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the United States government, G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and anyone else that you think you can somehow connect with what happened on 9/11 where guilty, complicit in, and responsible for 9/11 – that they were acting under the protection of law?

What if I were to tell you that Terrorism as defined in U.S. CODE is legal for the U.S. Government?

Well… this is the God honest truth.

On this 9/11/11, I feel almost obligated to say something about 9/11. After all… I was there. I watched the buildings fall from my roof. And so I finally shared how it felt that day in this interview:

Link Here: http://wakenews.net/uws_2011_09_10_1...9Hal_Clint.mp3

After so many years of trying to wake up the sleeping masses to the crimes committed on 9/11 by their own government, I now know that acts of “Terrorism” by the U.S. Government and its contractors (i.e. Halliburton and Blackwater) are perfectly legal under the U.S. CODE.

There is not a damn thing we the people can do about it from within the legal system.

And so perhaps we should be focusing on what the law is before we tell others to wake up. All these years of telling others they are sleeping, and it turns out we were all wrong!

We say that Building 7 is the “smoking gun”… But there is no smoking gun when crime is legal.

Terrorism is legal my friends.

Listen and learn…
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)

–Sunday, September 11, 2011

[Kokomoxcvcv]

Thanks for the link. But I do think we/I know who did it. They own the US of A from 1871.

[rojettafoxx]

Everything that the government deems to be a crime is not a crime if the government does it. Do as we say, not as we do.

How many people do you know who have taken the time to read any laws? I always wondered why the call the statutes 'Code'. It's because there is a hidden meaning in all of the statutes.

If you start with the assumption that you are the slave, and the laws are the will of your masters, you will be one step ahead of the people who think they already know everything. Through the law, your master can do whatever he wants to you, and there is nothing you can do about it. It helps however to know the distinction between lawful and legal. Much of what the government does is unlawful, yet perfectly legal.

The only way to protect yourself from the law is to not consent to anything that would put you under their jurisdiction. If you stay in Common Law jurisdiction, you have a much better chance of getting justice.

Hatha

And by the way, that smell in lower Manhattan on 9/11/01 was likely the micro pulverization of the steel in those buildings.

[Maserati]

This is a must listen. Nomoss, the content of the discussion is not directed to that point.

Someone wise told me, that when reading Code or Statute your should begin at the end of the code and work your way back. That way you can see the ends and perhaps better identify and understand the means. For the most part this does help. Not always....especially the older statutes. The newer ones are more suited to that principle.

Title 42 section 1981. Rights of US Citizens.