LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-13-2012, 08:36 PM   #1
koebforfrn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Thank you both for providing examples of pusillanimity.
Forgive me, I was only joking. I have no disagreement with what you post.

It\'s sad to see good people get so upset over thought-provoking, educational questions. The common argument is that these topics are out of touch with reality. What is reality? Is it not true that a global paradigm shift would render the current reality obsolete?
koebforfrn is offline


Old 05-14-2012, 05:48 AM   #2
TeveVikep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
483
Senior Member
Default
Those are all good questions. Hiibel vs Nevada establishes that ID must be shown. Again, most people assume court cases like this apply to THEM in the worst possible context. What Hibel establishes is that when you ask them who they are that they must ID themselves.

You need to establish that the coppiceman is in your plane, your time, your place, your space and your lawform.
You must also be acutely aware that the cop has a gun and can invalidate all your rights with a single round of ammunition, and never be held to account for it.

The cops do not protect us. Anyone who believes they do is in for a rude shock. You have to assert your rights or else you don't have them. Even in a state of pusillanimity. These are your common law rights. Cops don't enforce laws. They enforce statutes which are corporate policy.


Hatha
TeveVikep is offline


Old 05-14-2012, 06:12 AM   #3
Mjypksun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
You need to establish that the coppiceman is in your plane, your time, your place, your space and your lawform.
I've noticed you have used this term regularly for a while now. I wonder what the reference is to viticulture? Is it a low hanging fruit analogy?
Mjypksun is offline


Old 05-14-2012, 11:44 AM   #4
no02rSx2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
You must also be acutely aware that the cop has a gun and can invalidate all your rights with a single round of ammunition, and never be held to account for it.
You are responsible for your own self-defense and there is no insurance company you can purchase that will handle this for you. Obama outsources his self-defense to the Secret Service but then they are protecting the office rather than the man or woman occupying it.

The cops do not protect us. Anyone who believes they do is in for a rude shock. You have to assert your rights or else you don't have them. Even in a state of pusillanimity. These are your common law rights. Cops don't enforce laws. They enforce statutes which are corporate policy.
They protect corporate property. They will even protect you if you fall in this category.
no02rSx2 is offline


Old 05-14-2012, 11:46 AM   #5
no02rSx2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
I've noticed you have used this term regularly for a while now. I wonder what the reference is to viticulture? Is it a low hanging fruit analogy?
Reference must be credited to Steven King. This appears after all to be one of his scarier fictions yet.
no02rSx2 is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity