General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Gulf stream has been slowed by oil volcano
![]() According to Kutcherov, a leading specialist in the theory of abiogenic deep origin of petroleum, “What BP drilled into was what we call a ‘migration channel,’ a deep fault on which hydrocarbons generated in the depth of our planet migrate to the crust and are accumulated in rocks, something like Ghawar in Saudi Arabia.” Ghawar, the world’s most prolific oilfield has been producing millions of barrels daily for almost 70 years with no end in sight. According to the abiotic science, Ghawar like all elephant and giant oil and gas deposits all over the world, is located on a migration channel similar to that in the oil-rich Gulf of Mexico. As I wrote at the time of the January 2010 Haiti earthquake disaster, Haiti had been identified as having potentially huge hydrocasrbon reserves, as has neighboring Cuba. Kutcherov estimates that the entire Gulf of Mexico is one of the planet’s most abundant accessible locations to extract oil and gas, at least before the Deepwater Horizon event this April. “In my view the heads of BP reacted with panic at the scale of the oil spewing out of the well,” Kutcherov adds. “What is inexplicable at this point is why they are trying one thing, failing, then trying a second, failing, then a third. Given the scale of the disaster they should try every conceivable option, even if it is ten, all at once in hope one works. Otherwise, this oil source could spew oil for years given the volumes coming to the surface already.” He stresses, “It is difficult to estimate how big this leakage is. There is no objective information available.” But taking into consideration information about the last BP ‘giant’ discovery in the Gulf of Mexico, the Tiber field, some six miles deep, Kutcherov agrees with Ira Leifer a researcher in the Marine Science Institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara who says the oil may be gushing out at a rate of more than 100,000 barrels a day. What the enormoity of the oil spill does is to also further discredit clearly the oil companies’ myth of “peak oil” which claims that the world is at or near the “peak” of economical oil extraction. That myth, which has been propagated in recent years by circles close to former oilman and Bush Vice President, Dick Cheney, has been effectively used by the giant oil majors to justify far higher oil prices than would be politically possible otherwise, by claiming a non-existent petroleum scarcity crisis. Obama & BP Try to Hide According to a report from Washington investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, “the Obama White House and British Petroleum are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and working together to limit BP’s liability for damage caused by what can be called a ‘mega-disaster.’” Madsen cites sources within the US Army Corps of Engineers, FEMA, and Florida Department of Environmental Protection for his assertion. http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article20207.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
did a thread on this, 20 replies,
Thread: Gulf Stream dying, Gulf Loop Current already dead- New Ice Age? |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
did a thread on this, 20 replies, ![]() vBulletin Message Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
![]() Warming data show shades of grey THE former deputy prime minister of Britain was apocalyptic. "Our polar ice caps are melting," thundered John Prescott. "Only this weekend Mexico was hit by freak snowstorms ... a world of drought and crop failures, rising seas, mass migration and disease ... rising greenhouse grasses (sic)." The year was 1997 and Prescott had just come back from Kyoto in Japan to give the House of Commons his account of the latest climate talks. Prescott's terrifying warnings were backed by Britain's leading climate scientists. Just before Kyoto a Met Office report warned that climate-related floods would put 50 million people at risk of death from starvation in the coming decades. Whole island nations would disappear, it added, while the American midwest, which helps to feed 100 nations, was likely to face drought and the North Pole might melt. That was 15 years ago - what has happened to world temperatures since then? Last month came the suggestion that the answer was, embarrassingly, nothing. Research based on Met Office figures pointed to temperatures having been flat since 1997. t was the kind of admission that those who doubt climate science pounce on. "Forget global warming" trumpeted the Mail on Sunday, because "the planet has not warmed in 15 years". It then cited other research, into the declining energy output of the sun, to suggest the real danger was from a big freeze, raising the prospect of a reprise of the frost fairs held on the frozen Thames in the 17th century.... http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...-1226264121900 Maunder minimum closing in. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|