[Joircarm]

i always thought of chutzpah as having courage & initiative, a good thing. I think of chutzpah more as more synonymous with, audacity...
1 a : intrepidly daring : adventurous b :: rash
2 : contemptuous of law, religion, or decorum : insolent
3 : marked by originality and verve A meme I would like to see catch on more is, "(The) Chutzpah Maneuver", a phrase I made up which I find to be the zio's favorite deception technique. Its basic steps are:

Step 1: Invert reality (victim/victimizer, good/bad, right/wrong, up/down, black/white, etc),

Step 2: Project this fruadulent, inverted reality onto your opponent, by accusing them of displaying what is in reality a perfect, mirror-image description of your own consistently demonstrated behaviors, lies, agendas, and modus operandi's.

Step 3: Self righteously proclaim or otherwise clearly imply your "victimhood" status at having to endure these (your) dishonorable qualities which you've fraudulently accused your opponent of displaying (in step 2).


Perfect description of the zio's War On Terror Hoax, eh?

So my "Chutzpah Maneuver" definition ^ has some overlap with the "Big Lie" deception technique- which Hitler apparently coined in describing organized-Jewry's penchant for the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously." Steps 1 & 2 (invert reality, project), independently as well as in combination, amount to an audacious "Big Lie". while step 3 is the vital "appeal to emotion" part of the Chutzpah Maneuver, where the primary deceiver employing the Chutzpah Maneuver postures as victim/underdog/etc, rightly deserving the sympathy of virtuous observers (who are prone to projecting their own good virtue onto others, thus dismissing the possibility that anyone could invert-reality/LIE so audaciously). If the deceiver's (= the party who employs the Chutzpah Maneuver) target audience is allowed to remain in a rational/objective state of mind, the deceiver's audacious steps 1 & 2 are in jeopardy of withering under the audience's critical scrutiny, and could thus backfire on the deceiver. So step 3, the appeal to emotion, seeks to deactivate the target audience's critical thinking faculties, and to grease the audacious lie home on the wings of appealing to the audience's emotional sympathy, virtue & sense of justice.

also see:

Thread: "Among The Truthers", Straus, the Protocols, and the Chutzpah Maneuver

Separately, back to the synagogue's shake-down attempt on Gibson- don't dajooz also tend to lend amongst themselves at low, if any, interest? Usury is for goyim... right?