[LarpBulaBus]

I didnt stay on top of this thread, but to come to Midnights help is "yes" the law is on your side if you know where you stand within the law (forms). And that determines, here in America, if you are a "US citizen" or the "People" or any one of the other catagories of statue the Constitution acknowledges.

The judge was asking everyone if they were "a US citizen" however he didn't get that far with me before I shut him down.

[BariGrootrego]

Originally Posted by midnight rambler even if there
are loopholes you can try to exploit , force will still be used against you .

It's not about 'loopholes'. IMO anyone who tries to assert that is a complete incompetent dumbshit. It's about the law. "Ignorance of the law is no excuse."


like i said, i believe none of what you say anymore. you have far to many "i met this cop and schooled him on the law," "i went to court and flummoxed this judge," etc. stories for any of them to be credible or true.

in 2 months you'll change your moniker again and be back at it under a new name. o--> Spoken like a true legal incompetent.

As for 'schooling the trooper on the law' that simply didn't happen and I never said that. What I did say is that I challenged him over what he was accusing me of (a felony) and he refused to engage me in that conversation. This makes you a liar.

[ClorrerVeks]

i would prefer to be all of those things rather than go through life as a liar or a coward. you sir, are both.

Being called a liar and coward by someone of unsound mind doesn't trouble me in the least, in fact it's to be expected.

[Haibundadam]

After that get a good lawyer and pray. Advice only a legally incompetent 'person' would give, i.e. an idiot, imbecile or an infant.

The very moment you retain a BAR card carrying shyster you've surrendered to an officer of the court and can no longer make any jurisdictional challenges. In effect one has become a ward of the court (again, a legally incompetent person such as an idiot, imbecile, or infant.

On Lawyers in America
Corpus Juris Secundum, Attorney & Client, Sec. 4, pg 802.
Who Does yourAttorney Really Represent?
1. Read the 11th Chapter of the Gospel of Luke.
2. Americans appearing in American courts represented by
licensed lawyers are known to be "wards-of-the-court". See,
e.g., Corpus Juris Secundum, Attorney & Client, Sec. 2, pg 769.
: Black's Law Dictionary (5th Ed., 1991) defines "wardsof-
the-court" as "infants" or "persons of unsound mind".
You could "look it up". Your lawyer didn't explain this to
you when he took your money? Ever Wonder why?
3. "His [the attorney's] first duty is to the court, not to the
client, and wherever the duties he owes to the client
conflict with the duties he owes to the court, as an officer of
the court in the administration of justice, the former must
yield to the latter". Corpus Juris Secundum, Attorney &
Client, Sec. 4, pg 802. [Emphasis mine.] Your lawyer didn't
explain this to you either?
4. In the Oxford English Dictionary [600,000+ entries in 22
volumes], look up "lawyer" & "liar". After you learn why
those words are connected phonetically in English.

[gunhijala]

Originally Posted by chad Originally Posted by midnight rambler even if there
are loopholes you can try to exploit , force will still be used against you .

It's not about 'loopholes'. IMO anyone who tries to assert that is a complete incompetent dumbshit. It's about the law. "Ignorance of the law is no excuse."


like i said, i believe none of what you say anymore. you have far to many "i met this cop and schooled him on the law," "i went to court and flummoxed this judge," etc. stories for any of them to be credible or true.

in 2 months you'll change your moniker again and be back at it under a new name. o--> Spoken like a true legal incompetent.

As for 'schooling the trooper on the law' that simply didn't happen and I never said that. What I did say is that I challenged him over what he was accusing me of (a felony) and he refused to engage me in that conversation. This makes you a liar. here's why i generally find you disagreeable and unpleasant to be around:

1) you post a story, generally genuinely interesting.

2) i read said story, investigate it, find more to the story, + post it. generally, this contradicts your point. not saying my point is necessarily correct or better than yours, but i post it to present the other side.

3) you immediatley jump to profanity, calling names + insult me and any other peron who doesn't agree with you.

this time, i joined in with the profanity, i shouldn't have. so let me say this instead:

personally, i believe you to be a liar, as your personal macguyver like ecounters with the law just do not add up. over the course of sukhoi_fan, i am me i am free, and midnight rambler, you must have posted at least 50 of your infamous run ins with "the man," all of which result in you walking free, "shutting down judges," + beating the system. highly unbelievable. the amount of stories you tell just does not add up.

more than that however, i believe you also to be a coward.

right off the bat in this thread, i posted links to credible news sources citing that the free man in question was found guilty and is facing more prosecution. you choose to ignore this information and pretend it does not exist. instead, you resort to name calling. very cowardly.

eventually, you'll change monikers again, like you always do and try and present yourself as someone new. also, very cowardly. when exposed as the fraud you are, you slink off and come back as someone new.

you've repeatedly called me a "dumbshit," "fucking stupid," "an ignorant slave," and my personal favorite at GIM1 "a moron of the lowest level."

i would prefer to be all of those things rather than go through life as a liar or a coward. you sir, are both.

[arraxylap]

I wish all of you who consider yourselves so worldly, wise, and knowledgeable would kindly show me FACTUALLY how an entry (a legal fiction, in reality it doesn't exist) in a database which isn't my creation, something which I have absolutely NO control over, I have no interest in it, I gain no benefit in it, and sociopaths getting gov.org paychecks have access to it and can add whatever info they think they can get away with to it is in anyway *me* and that I'm somehow responsible for it. Additionally, to believe that this legal fiction in a database in any way relates to a human one would necessarily have to subscribe to a belief system where life only begins after one has passed through the birth canal.

Put up or shut up.

Y'all be careful, I don't want anyone getting hurt in the mad rush to FACTUALLY prove the nexus.

[Talicoabilk]

Dees is 3rd hour guest on Rense radio tonight, 9-10 PM PT, repeating 12-1 AM PT.

LISTEN

[broksaksaak]

No, Dees 'gets it' about the ALL CAPS NAME and the giving of consent.

I had the judge tell me very clearly and for the record: "No one is forcing you to do anything." I find that very telling.

No one is forcing you to do or say anything in the courtroom. 100% correct.

This process holds true right up until the ruling takes place, then the baliff or police arrive and force a baton into your ass.

LOL...

[viagra-kaufen]

I look at the straw/freeman concepts for a good six months some of the info was correct but usually mixed with bull. Most of the guru's claims were never backed up with court cases and yes some wins never are reported.

The only guy I have seen that talks the talk and has won court cases some up to the supreme court is George Gordon he has a school and schools people.

He's doesn't bs about his losses and is pretty straight foreword by telling people if you are not willing to spend time in jail don't even try just sit down shut up and enjoy the ride.

He has an extensive audio archive on a variety of subjects, he tell a lot on his programs but leaves a little out as he is in business.

If anything it is worth a listen to grasp a look at how thing work.

[dhrishiasv]

Thanks po boy here is his web site............


http://library.georgegordon.com/