What You Thought v. What Actually IS - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**myhackingtosh_ws** · 12-15-2011, 02:14 PM

Following are several reasons to re-examine your relationship with your city, village, township or county.

Padberg v. Roos, 404 SW2d 161, Supreme Court of Missouri, April 11, 1966
A county or a city, charter or otherwise, is imperium in imperio, that is, a government with a government. The people of a county or city, as such, are not sovereign.

Wayne County v. Michigan Public Service Commission, 72 NW2d 109, 1955
A "county" is a body politic composed of cities, villages and townships.

While the first cases talks of "people" there are none in any city, village, township or county.

12-15-2011, 02:14 PM	#1
myhackingtosh_ws Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 493 Senior Member	What You Thought v. What Actually IS Following are several reasons to re-examine your relationship with your city, village, township or county. Padberg v. Roos, 404 SW2d 161, Supreme Court of Missouri, April 11, 1966 A county or a city, charter or otherwise, is imperium in imperio, that is, a government with a government. The people of a county or city, as such, are not sovereign. Wayne County v. Michigan Public Service Commission, 72 NW2d 109, 1955 A "county" is a body politic composed of cities, villages and townships. While the first cases talks of "people" there are none in any city, village, township or county. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)