LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-16-2011, 09:51 AM   #1
KellyMP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default Oxford Comma
!
KellyMP is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 12:44 PM   #2
niemamczasu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Invalid poll!
niemamczasu is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 01:08 PM   #3
TimoDass

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
641
Senior Member
Default
WAIT FOR THE POLE!
TimoDass is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 03:03 PM   #4
irresseni

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
How could you fools possibly vote yes?
irresseni is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 05:00 PM   #5
Ruilnasr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
Had to look into Wiki to get what this is about. In Kraut normally it's uncommon, but my presence in the anglophone net sphere has kinda brainwashed me to use it myself
Ruilnasr is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 05:25 PM   #6
twinaircant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
No, no and no.
twinaircant is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 05:36 PM   #7
Mr_White

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
594
Senior Member
Default
Whichever produces the least ambiguous sentence.
Mr_White is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 07:36 PM   #8
omaculer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
People who refuse to use the Oxford comma are undoubtedly illbred, boorish, and retarded.
omaculer is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 09:31 PM   #9
Gscvbhhv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
358
Senior Member
Default
Explicitly forbidden in Russian.
Gscvbhhv is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 10:43 PM   #10
KuevDulin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default
The Oxford Comma is the only unambiguous way to make a list.

Consider the classic example:
To my parents, Ayn Rand and God. This could mean two very different things, sans Oxford Comma.
KuevDulin is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 10:47 PM   #11
pharmablogger

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
I usually write "X, Y, and Z" rather then X, Y and Z"
pharmablogger is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 10:48 PM   #12
viagra-kaufen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
I still think it's an invalid poll.
viagra-kaufen is offline


Old 07-16-2011, 11:51 PM   #13
Gilowero

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
;
Gilowero is offline


Old 07-17-2011, 12:04 AM   #14
mirex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
Interesting bunch of people agreeing. Me, Asher, Slowwy, and Oerdin all on the same side.
mirex is offline


Old 07-17-2011, 12:10 AM   #15
Depolit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
311
Senior Member
Default
Crap. Anything that Ben AND Oerdin agree on must be the wrongest thing ever... like a Platonic form of wrong-ness
Depolit is offline


Old 07-17-2011, 12:15 AM   #16
zdoppiklonikaa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
What ever gave you the impression that I'm a Randian?
The opportunity was too good to pass up. "My parents, Ayn Rand and God" is as though Ayn Rand is substituted for Mary as the mother of Jesus. Considering the recent debate in the other thread about your (and Dave Floyd's) claims of the capitalist underpinnings of the Gospel, I thought alluding to your Capitalist Jesus™ in this instance was a good opportunity.

It is not to be taken literally. It was an attempt at humor.
zdoppiklonikaa is offline


Old 07-17-2011, 12:19 AM   #17
u8MmZFmF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default
Only a retard like Albert would think it means Ayn Rand is your mother.

Also, you could just rearrange the order. "To Ayn Rand, my parents and God". What is so difficult about that?

edit: hey, I just found a counterexample on Wikipedia. "To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God". Sounds like a rather ambiguous way to make lists.
The counterexample is stupid because that is not a list. It was a poor stylistic choice better serviced by paranthesis.
u8MmZFmF is offline


Old 07-17-2011, 12:30 AM   #18
Bemapayople

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
305
Senior Member
Default
It is not to be taken literally. It was an attempt at humor. I did laugh, but wanted to be sure that was the intent. You're not the first who's said that btw.
Bemapayople is offline


Old 07-17-2011, 01:02 AM   #19
OccumCymn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
360
Senior Member
Default
Crap. Anything that Ben AND Oerdin agree on must be the wrongest thing ever... like a Platonic form of wrong-ness
Wrongest?
OccumCymn is offline


Old 07-17-2011, 01:57 AM   #20
taesrom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
It's simply a poor stylistic choice. It's not a list because there's not three distinct items in that quote.

"To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God"
Should obviously be:
"To my mother (Ayn Rand) and God"
or:
"To God and my mother, Ayn Rand"

An Oxford Comma is only to be used when there are three or more items in a list. What? Ayn Rand, your mother and God are three different things. But if you use the Oxford comma then it looks like two different things because Oxford commas are stupid.
taesrom is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:06 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity