[galaktiusman]

Here is an interesting read......

What do you think??

[XU8i6ysK]

There are multiple ways to look at it and not everyone is going to agree with either.

One one side, there is a boys team and a girls team. So, it could be argued that she shouldn't be allowed on the boys team. And, the "girls have been allowed to play football" arguement is not valid here, IMO. It's not "the boys football team". It's just "football team". There is no male/female designation.

It's not the boys fault that not enough girls signed up for a formal team.
(In 2012, however, only three girls turned out for Castleford's girls' squad, one too few to field a formal team. Rather than play as an individual, Harr, the No. 3 female golfer in Idaho in her age group with a 2.2 handicap, won the Idaho High School Activities Association's permission to play with Castleford's boys' team provided she qualified every week.)

The association could have very easily said, she had to play as an individaul, in girls competitions. But, now they're are going to waffle because some boys parents probably complained to his coach because that girl "took his spot".

On the other side of the coin, who cares if a girl is on the boys team, as long as she is playing from the same tees. My dad coached h.s. golf when Nancy Lopez played on the boys team at her h.s. From the stories he's told me, he couldn't care less. But, the boys on his team couldn't handle getting beat by a girl. And, they generally played worse because the were trying so hard to not get beat by a girl, instead of playing their own game.

[outsitWrord]

I think you have to let them play. I coach the Boys and Girls team here. My girls team is made up of 2 players. I have them travel and play with the team. I think it is great for both. It allows the girls to play and with some stiff competition. Female athletes have come a long way and I think any chance we have to support girls is something we must do.

More important I hate the idea of someone who just wants to play this game getting turned away. How does this help the game of golf?

[NerbuitW]

THere is an intriguing comment in there which is true. The golf ball doesn't care if it is being hit by a girl or by a boy. To be honest, I can't believe that we are having these discussions anymore. It would seem to me to be a pretty open and shut case. How many high school football teams, have girls playing on them all over the country. Granted, it's not seen in every school, but it's common enough that it isn't ground breaking anymore. There are even colleges with girls playing on the team now. If the school had a girls team, then I would say that is where she should be playing, and I would even temper that. If she is capable of hitting from the same tees as the boys and able to compete, let her play with the boys and school them. I didn't catch in the article if it said what tees she is playing from, so I'll assume that she is playing from the same tees, I don't think it said. Sounds to me like a few coaches are getting tired of their prized stud getting stomped on by this girl and so now they want to file a complaint. The fact of the matter is that most school golf teams have a wide and varied skill level from the one or two stars who are scratch to single handicappers and may have a chance to a scholarship all the way to the kid who is happy to get the ball off of the tee. That being said, the fact that she is female is irrelevant. There will be a handicap and skill set that she will match up with. Just like the girl playing football with the boys, my only caveat would be that she hit from the same set of tees. You Go Girl!!

[Noilemaillilm]

There are multiple ways to look at it and not everyone is going to agree with either.

One one side, there is a boys team and a girls team. So, it could be argued that she shouldn't be allowed on the boys team. And, the "girls have been allowed to play football" arguement is not valid here, IMO. It's not "the boys football team". It's just "football team". There is no male/female designation.

You wrote this as I was writing mine. I have to disagree with this statement for two reasons. One is that since football is obviously a sport with bigger boys playing, faster and stronger and it is a contact sport, emphasis on contact, most girls cannot physically compete on the same field as the boys and thus there is not as much interest by the girls to play the sport, thus the following logic is that is why there is not a division between boys and girls in this sport at this time in high school. It's never been an option. In this case, there were not enough girls to sign up, so there is NO girls team, which makes the boys team the only golf team, thus by definition becoming "The Golf Team", not to boys golf team. If there were a current distinction between the boys and girls golf team, then I would say she should play with the girls even though she may be able to compete with the boys. And that brings up a whole new argument. Girls football teams are on the rise, and while I don't believe they will ever become mainstream, I do think that one day, in large school districts, you may find some schools with a girls division. That will also get decided by the almighty dollar as well though. Until that time, it renders the argument of girls/boys football moot since there is only one option. At this school, this year, there is only one option for golf as well.

You are probably right as well, that there was some kid who can barely get the ball off of the tee who didn't make the team and now his parents are crying. My advice is, get better than the number 10 kid on the team (assuming 5 var and 5 jv) and go out and make the team.

[truck]

We had a girl play on our Boy's HS Golf team my junior year. She was very good and she beat a lot of her opponents. She had no special rules for her. She played the back tees (often over 7000). She didn't play my senior year, choosing to play more AJGA events. I see nothing wrong with this.

[Nurse_sero]

It really depends on what the state's HS athletic governing body decides. In TN, season play does not determine tournament seating, so what the coaches do during matches is their own decision. However, at the regional/district and state tournaments, there is a girls and boys division.

I had a girl golfer that played against the boys (from the white or blue tees) every year during the season. It was quite a sight and most boys or their parents did not complain, even when they were beat.

[gariharrr]

There's a term for situations where we allow ourselves to be confined by an "OR" decision - the fools choice. The better approach is to find ways to give yourself an "AND" decision.

In this case, the decision precludes two girls and one boy from playing golf, so I don't like it. They should have granted a waiver allowing the school to field a 3 person girls team. This would have allowed for the most participation, avoided the gender based controversy and given the school extra time to recruit a 4th player.

[Heessduernbub]

You wrote this as I was writing mine. I have to disagree with this statement for two reasons. One is that since football is obviously a sport with bigger boys playing, faster and stronger and it is a contact sport, emphasis on contact, most girls cannot physically compete on the same field as the boys and thus there is not as much interest by the girls to play the sport, thus the following logic is that is why there is not a division between boys and girls in this sport at this time in high school. It's never been an option. In this case, there were not enough girls to sign up, so there is NO girls team, which makes the boys team the only golf team, thus by definition becoming "The Golf Team", not to boys golf team. If there were a current distinction between the boys and girls golf team, then I would say she should play with the girls even though she may be able to compete with the boys. .. Until that time, it renders the argument of girls/boys football moot since there is only one option. At this school, this year, there is only one option for golf as well.

You are probably right as well, that there was some kid who can barely get the ball off of the tee who didn't make the team and now his parents are crying. My advice is, get better than the number 10 kid on the team (assuming 5 var and 5 jv) and go out and make the team.

Golf is in individual sport which can be set up for team play. Football is a team sport. One cannot play football as an individual. If not enough kids try out for a football team, there is no opportunity for you to play. You must have 11 kids suit up. In this girl's situation, there was not enough girls signed up for "a formal team". But, she could still compete for the girls individual competitions.

I am not for/against either solution. I am merely playing devil's advocate. From what I can tell, the verbiage clearly designates girl's team and boy's team. If there isn't enough players for a girl's team, then, in golf, you would/could still compete for the girl's individual trophies and championships.

The sad part of this is the parents of the boys that are complaining. If I had a son (I have a daughter, btw), I would tell him to practice more and quit his whining.

My guess is that cooler heads will prepare and she will get to keep on playing on the boys team. The administration set that precedent when they let her play last year.

[ariniaxia]

If she plays the same tee's as the boys I see it as fair, but if she gets closer tee's it's bs. I've always been pretty neutral on women play in men's sports but I've always wanted to something like a star baseball player play on the softball team just to see the controversy.

[omaculer]

There's a term for situations where we allow ourselves to be confined by an "OR" decision - the fools choice. The better approach is to find ways to give yourself an "AND" decision.

In this case, the decision precludes two girls and one boy from playing golf, so I don't like it. They should have granted a waiver allowing the school to field a 3 person girls team. This would have allowed for the most participation, avoided the gender based controversy and given the school extra time to recruit a 4th player.

You cannot have a 3 person golf team. Team scoring in golf is based on the lowest 4 scores out of 5 players. At a minimun you must have 4 players on a team.

[Kneedycrype]

Take the lowest two scores and have the highest score used twice. Ive seen it done.

You cannot have a 3 person golf team. Team scoring in golf is based on the lowest 4 scores out of 5 players. At a minimun you must have 4 players on a team.

[jurhoonee]

Take the lowest two scores and have the highest score used twice. Ive seen it done.

That seems exploitable to me.

[spapsinee]

If she is playing by the same rules as all of her male competitors it shouldn't be an issue. There have been females play in a PGA Tour event so this shouldn't be any different to me IMO

[Grennios]

Well in my hometown the score being used twice was usually in the 100's so its not as cut and dry as a team with a 2.2 handicap and two 7 handicaps, but I have seen it done.

That seems exploitable to me.

[Beedcardabeme]

Golf is in individual sport which can be set up for team play. Football is a team sport. One cannot play football as an individual. If not enough kids try out for a football team, there is no opportunity for you to play. You must have 11 kids suit up. In this girl's situation, there was not enough girls signed up for "a formal team". But, she could still compete for the girls individual competitions.

I am not for/against either solution. I am merely playing devil's advocate. From what I can tell, the verbiage clearly designates girl's team and boy's team. If there isn't enough players for a girl's team, then, in golf, you would/could still compete for the girl's individual trophies and championships.

I agree with that point. And arguments can obviously be made for both sides. I've just always personally felt that if the girl can compete with the boys on the boys playing field, then let her have at it. If she can't cut it, she won't make the team. In this case, she has already proven not only can she cut it, she can help carry the team to a title. It seems a little vindictive, but if they won't let her play, then they should make that decision retroactive and give up past awards that she contributed to. I'd bet that would make it easy for them to choose which side of the fence they want to sit on.

[avdddcxnelkaxz]

Take the lowest two scores and have the highest score used twice. Ive seen it done.

Do you want a fair competition that has winners and losers? Or, do you want to hand out participation trophies?

[Rnlvifov]

We have a young lady at our school who plays on the boys team. She plays the same tee's. (she is very good) I see no problem with it... JMHO

[KitRittyTug]

Well in my hometown the score being used twice was usually in the 100's so its not as cut and dry as a team with a 2.2 handicap and two 7 handicaps, but I have seen it done.

Sounds like you played on a team very similar to mine >.

[cQT6nmEc]

IMO, the rules need to be re-written. If a young lady is good enough to play with (and beat) the boys, and she wants to do so, let her tee it up. I can't imagine a coach complaining about getting beat fair and square. Who cares if she is wearing a skort? How else is she going to improve enough to advance later on in her career if there is not enough female competition at the 2A level in rural Idaho?