Golftec Set Evaluation - Page 2 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**Emapymosy** · 06-27-2012, 11:02 PM

Nice read BMW, just from reading the swinglab report what order did you hit the irons in? The Burner and R11 were 5 mph faster on average than the other two.

**MarlboroCig** · 06-27-2012, 11:07 PM

Nice read BMW, just from reading the swinglab report what order did you hit the irons in? The Burner and R11 were 5 mph faster on average than the other two.

2.0, R11, Mizzy, i20.

We took about a 5 min break between clubs to analyze each group of figures. I think the increase in speed was due to the shafts in the TM irons. The other 2 had comparable shafts but not the kbs 90s.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using Tapatalk 2

**Emapymosy** · 06-27-2012, 11:12 PM

2.0, R11, Mizzy, i20.

We took about a 5 min break between clubs to analyze each group of figures. I think the increase in speed was due to the shafts in the TM irons. The other 2 had comparable shafts but not the kbs 90s.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using Tapatalk 2

Gotcha. Proves how much the shaft has to do with maximizing potential of the head.

**MarlboroCig** · 06-27-2012, 11:17 PM

Gotcha. Proves how much the shaft has to do with maximizing potential of the head.

Thats correct! I honestly can say that I couldnt tell the difference with shaft weight but the numbers dont lie. Id take 5mph extra anyday!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using Tapatalk 2

**vqIo7X2U** · 06-28-2012, 01:15 AM

Great info. now I've got to at least look into getting this done myself.

06-27-2012, 11:02 PM	#1
Emapymosy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	Nice read BMW, just from reading the swinglab report what order did you hit the irons in? The Burner and R11 were 5 mph faster on average than the other two. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-27-2012, 11:07 PM	#2
MarlboroCig Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 500 Senior Member	Nice read BMW, just from reading the swinglab report what order did you hit the irons in? The Burner and R11 were 5 mph faster on average than the other two. 2.0, R11, Mizzy, i20. We took about a 5 min break between clubs to analyze each group of figures. I think the increase in speed was due to the shafts in the TM irons. The other 2 had comparable shafts but not the kbs 90s. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using Tapatalk 2 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-27-2012, 11:12 PM	#3
Emapymosy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	2.0, R11, Mizzy, i20. We took about a 5 min break between clubs to analyze each group of figures. I think the increase in speed was due to the shafts in the TM irons. The other 2 had comparable shafts but not the kbs 90s. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using Tapatalk 2 Gotcha. Proves how much the shaft has to do with maximizing potential of the head. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-27-2012, 11:17 PM	#4
MarlboroCig Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 500 Senior Member	Gotcha. Proves how much the shaft has to do with maximizing potential of the head. Thats correct! I honestly can say that I couldnt tell the difference with shaft weight but the numbers dont lie. Id take 5mph extra anyday! Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II using Tapatalk 2 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-28-2012, 01:15 AM	#5
vqIo7X2U Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 445 Senior Member	Great info. now I've got to at least look into getting this done myself. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)