Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I posted a bit earlier about Callaway offering to replace my broken FT-Iz with either Razr Hawk or Octane. I had the chance to try out both models in the i-mix version here and 'discovered' something very interesting.
I have been trying to get more swing speed with the longer lighter shafts, using the L5V and a 46.5" shaft, the Xl270 46.25" shaft, and the Adams G4 46.25" shaft. All these work as advertised clearly increasing my SS to over 90mph on the simulator. I have been happy to see 90+ for the SS but have still been frustrated with my actual driving results. The i-mix versions of the Callaway drivers measure in at 45". So I went to really test the feel and dispersion numbers, figuring the distance would be better with the stock 46" when I finally make the choice. And what did I find? SS did come down with the shorter heavier shafts I tried, but my ball speed for both the Octane and the Hawk were up- way up- over 125mph. My distance went up and my dispersion was much much better. At 45", the Octane armed with a Fubuki and the Razr Hawk equipped with an Epic were significantly better then anything I have used in a long while. I have not made a choice yet- but it looks like I have MUCH better control with the shorter heavier shafts which is giving me higher ball speeds with lower swing speeds. Speed without control is useless. I have been focusing on the wrong speed stat. Ball speed is where its at! Callaway has offered to put in a custom shaft for me for a small extra fee. So I am thinking of dropping to 45". Still can't decide on the Octane/Fubuki or the Hawk/Epic...... |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
You are getting more ball speed because you are hitting the middle of the face more frequently. Everything else falls in line after that. I had similar difficulties with the Cleveland XL270, swing seeds of nearly 105, but subpar accuracy and ball speed for a 105 SS (140s). My understanding is SS X 1.5 is a rough estimate of expected ball speed. Sure I will be corrected on this.
Yours is a great example of shafts that are too long and the overemphasis on swing speed. Wish I could recommend which driver. I'd go with what gives you the greatest confidence at address if all else is equal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
How much of a difference was there in distance/ dispersion between the razr and the octane? No ballooning at all with either club and that was a surprise as it is something I struggle with and because these are both shallower faced drivers then what I am used to playing. I am leaning towards the Octane because of the extra forgiveness- but keep in mind this is at a 85-90 SS and someone that is not at the level to be able shape shots off the tee. They are both worth testing out. I still can't get over how much my ball speed and control improved with the 45" shafts. I am going to try them again over the weekend- and bring along my 7 iron just to be sure the simulator is giving me real numbers. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
I had been working on increasing my swing speed using a training aid thinking it would increase my distance. It didn't. My game went South to the point I couldn't even hit a short iron with any consistency. It wasn't until, out of despiration, I slowed way down and focused on ball contact that my game came back. I have since put all of my efforts into perfect balance and smooth tempo and guess what? I gained two clubs in distance and more accuracy too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
I think everyone gets caught up in thinking higher swing speed equates to more distance. Many things factor into why one person hits a given driver x number of yards, while another person hits it further with the same swing speed.
I think the OEM's and the professional tours make us search for distance when we would be better served searching for accuracy. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|