LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-14-2008, 01:21 AM   #1
Suentiend

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default Recreational Drugs And Their Level Of Harm
Interesting.

Recreational Drugs and their level of harm

How the government can possibly justify their stupid laws on recreational drugs is beyond me!
Suentiend is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 01:28 AM   #2
Mediconlinee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
That is really interesting... Does it take a graph however to spell out the dangers of alcohol to the government? Yet the relative safety of the common drugs anyone can buy?
Mediconlinee is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 01:32 AM   #3
UriDepkeeks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
I think that by persisting with these outdated laws the government is misleading people. Personally I'm for all drugs being legal but if you think they should be banned according to the harm you can do yourself, the law paints a false picture which permeates society. I'm pretty sure there are a hell of a lot of people who think dropping Es are more harmful than smoking for instance.
UriDepkeeks is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 01:36 AM   #4
aideriimibion

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
As a former coke user and someone who has seen over even a fairly short period the damage heroin does to people I find the whole thing ludicrous.

If your not going to grade recreational drugs legality on their impact and damage, then what the fuck are you grading them on?
We apparantly pride ourselves on living in a modern society dictated by knowledge, or logic... But clearly in some matters we have neither.
aideriimibion is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 01:39 AM   #5
aceriscoolon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
just say no
aceriscoolon is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 02:08 AM   #6
NickGrass

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
585
Senior Member
Default
Harm to what? What is this chart and study basing itself on? Harm to self? Harm to others? Long term harm? short term harms?

People have passed out & been sent to hospitals to have their stomachs pumped, let alone people who've died from ODing on cocaine, LSD, Heroine, and other illegal drugs. You think thats less harmful than a 20-30+ year death sentence tobacco is? I don't get the point of this. Perhaps if everything is reclassified and the laws are loosened up a bit, do you think people driving high will do it less, or more?

I guarantee you if I drove drunk I'd hit something or someone. I guarantee you if I drove stoned off pot I'd hit something or someone.

Does this study take that into account?
NickGrass is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 02:10 AM   #7
investmentonlinev2006x

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
675
Senior Member
Default
Harm to what? What is this chart and study basing itself on? Harm to self? Harm to others? Long term harm? short term harms?

People have passed out and died from ODing on cocaine, LSD and Heroine. You think thats less harmful than a 20-30+ year death sentence tobacco is? I don't get the point of this. Perhaps if everything is reclassified and the laws are loosened up a bit, do you think people driving high will do it less, or more?

I guarantee you if I drove drunk I'd hit something or someone. I guarantee you if I drove stoned off pot I'd hit something or someone.

Does this study take that into account?
But can you take into account not looking both ways on before crossing the road when you've drunk a bit too much?

What you have stated are variables, and the whole idea of a scientific study is to eliminate as many variables as possible.
investmentonlinev2006x is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 02:13 AM   #8
ResistNewWorldOrder

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
But can you take into account not looking both ways on before crossing the road when you've drunk a bit too much?

What you have stated are variables, and the whole idea of a scientific study is to eliminate as many variables as possible.
Thats my point. It's not about variables. I'm not suited to be driving in either situation because of whatever I took caused me to not be in my right mind.
ResistNewWorldOrder is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 02:36 AM   #9
Mjxhnapi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Thats my point. It's not about variables. I'm not suited to be driving in either situation because of whatever I took caused me to not be in my right mind.
I apologise then for misreading your interpretation, I thought you wanted to add more variables into the study.
Mjxhnapi is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 03:19 AM   #10
casinoboneerer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
You're not going to prove anything to someone like Peter... You're wasting your breath James or should I say fingers...
casinoboneerer is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 12:09 PM   #11
mortgrhhh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
320
Senior Member
Default
You're not going to prove anything to someone like Peter... You're wasting your breath James or should I say fingers...
Well thanks for your valuable imput into this discussion.
James wasn't actually proving anything if you read his posts, he was just giving his opinion, a few good points too, I feel.
mortgrhhh is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity