[Phlkxkbh]

tell that to honeybunch, although im sure she wasnt necessarily "cold", but definately not a proven match dog, for what its worth.


shit look at frisco, the only thing he's proven was to have a golden dick! yet he's gotten more pussy than ron jeremy! and consistently throwin bulldogs! lol

Yea.. Frisco is never tested.. was once rolled once I believe and that's it. I think it's NC who said that, I might be wrong.

---------- Post added at 06:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:58 PM ----------

fair enough, which leads us to the next thread.........sportsmen vs dogmen lol

i know more times than not that the dogmen is also a sportsmen & vice versa but thats not every story....

It's your turn to create that thread LWG. Me and mr.clueless done our part!

---------- Post added at 06:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:23 PM ----------

your looking at it from a breeders perspective only......

the answer to the topic question is going to be the same as the other question about breeding the best or showing the best.

a breeder wants to produce......the matcher wants to win.....

the big difference is the breeder dont produce anything good without the man with the dog between his legs

thats why for me its performance every time.

This is true.. that is really a breeder's principle of breeding cold bitches. Personally, all my peers considered performance above anything else when breeding. One of my friends even tested a 1xW Amstaff breed to a 2xW jeep/redboy bitch and produced Ch Baskin. In the [] the bloodline won't be measured but the heart of the dog.

I like the phrase I bold out.