Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Both began exactly the same and were bred for diff. Factors. As being a large amount of APBT bloodlines.... some were bred only for looks and obviously weren't sport examined as that's illegal. But when they've the best bloodline and search they're considered an APBT... Despite the fact that they don't have gameness.... ?? Only wondering.... more and more APBTs which are being bred and perhaps not examined must then be AmStaffs right? Or is this all centered on looks? That's a bs reason to declare them diff, If that's the case. Types. It's therefore easier to call them diff. Kinds of exactly the same breed.... This really is directed towards the folks that sense that they're diff. Types. And I'm perhaps not attempting to be rude... and I will usually accept disagree... Since I've always wondered why people might feel differently than Lou Colby but wish to stop up the discussion.
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|