[HaremShaih]

So why wouldn't you have a climate scientist on the panel when you are having a Q&A about climate ?


It will all end in tears, with no clear winners.

'coz climate scientists are all conspirators in a giant hoax? Much better to hear from "experts" like Palmer...



Q&A used to be a good watch, but I can no longer suffer Tony Jones and the inane comments from the Twittersphere I have to put up with (just don't read them is the reply from those who Tweet. ORLY, it's bruddy near impossible to ignore it).

Serious topics and debate can be entertaining, but that should be a by-product, not a primary consideration. If I want that crap I can tune into those "hard-hitting" current affairs programs the commercial stations run (Any one here recall "Monday Conference", now that was a decent format).