LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-22-2012, 05:49 PM   #1
Grieryaliny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default THIS is Why We Invest in Science

See that picture above? It shows a new type of rocket engine design. Usually, fuel is pumped into a chamber where the chemicals ignite and are blown out the other end, creating thrust. The design pictured above does this in a new way: as the fuel is pumped into the chamber, it’s spun up, creating a vortex. This focuses the flow, keeping it closer to the center of the chamber. In this way, when the fuel ignite, it keeps the walls of the chamber cooler.
So what, right?

Here’s what: using this technology — developed for rockets for NASA, remember — engineers designed a way to pump water more quickly and efficiently for fire suppression. The result is nothing short of astonishing:
One series of tests using empty houses at Vandenberg Air Force Base compared [this new] system with a 20-gallon-per-minute, 1,400 pound-per-square-inch (psi) discharge capability (at the pump) versus a standard 100-gallon-per-minute, 125 psi standard hand line—the kind that typically takes a few firemen to control. The standard line extinguished a set fire in a living room in 1 minute and 45 seconds using 220 gallons of water. The [new] system extinguished an identical fire in 17.3 seconds using 13.6 gallons—with a hose requiring only one person to manage.In other words, this new system put out a fire more quickly, using less water, and — critically — with fewer firefighters needed to operate the hose. This frees up needed firefighters to do other important tasks on the job, and therefore makes fighting fires faster and safer.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba...-science-this/
Grieryaliny is offline


Old 03-22-2012, 06:02 PM   #2
Karensmith

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
573
Senior Member
Default

This frees up needed firefighters to do other important tasks on the job,
like pose for calendars
Karensmith is offline


Old 03-22-2012, 06:06 PM   #3
SpecialOFFER

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
like pose for calendars
YES!
SpecialOFFER is offline


Old 03-22-2012, 06:37 PM   #4
CaseyFronczek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default

oh my
CaseyFronczek is offline


Old 03-22-2012, 06:40 PM   #5
CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
That is awesome.
CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 01:34 AM   #6
aburva.org

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
That is pretty cool. I plan on going into the fire fighting career though, so this will probably make there be less of a need for fire fighters (due to less men having to control the hose), so it may be harder for me to get a job. Damn science.
aburva.org is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 03:01 AM   #7
Aztegjpl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
560
Senior Member
Default
I shall have to ask my son who is an Lt. on the FD if he has heard of this.

One drawback I see is that extreme pressure. That would be a concern for hoses bursting and what comes in contact with that stream.
Aztegjpl is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 03:08 AM   #8
Cucoulkrory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default

See that picture above? It shows a new type of rocket engine design. Usually, fuel is pumped into a chamber where the chemicals ignite and are blown out the other end, creating thrust. The design pictured above does this in a new way: as the fuel is pumped into the chamber, it’s spun up, creating a vortex. This focuses the flow, keeping it closer to the center of the chamber. In this way, when the fuel ignite, it keeps the walls of the chamber cooler.
So what, right?

Here’s what: using this technology — developed for rockets for NASA, remember — engineers designed a way to pump water more quickly and efficiently for fire suppression. The result is nothing short of astonishing:One series of tests using empty houses at Vandenberg Air Force Base compared [this new] system with a 20-gallon-per-minute, 1,400 pound-per-square-inch (psi) discharge capability (at the pump) versus a standard 100-gallon-per-minute, 125 psi standard hand line—the kind that typically takes a few firemen to control. The standard line extinguished a set fire in a living room in 1 minute and 45 seconds using 220 gallons of water. The [new] system extinguished an identical fire in 17.3 seconds using 13.6 gallons—with a hose requiring only one person to manage.In other words, this new system put out a fire more quickly, using less water, and — critically — with fewer firefighters needed to operate the hose. This frees up needed firefighters to do other important tasks on the job, and therefore makes fighting fires faster and safer.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba...-science-this/
NNOOOOOoooo!!! It's a job killer. The unions will never go for it. Sarcasm.gif
Cucoulkrory is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 03:15 AM   #9
Adimondin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
I shall have to ask my son who is an Lt. on the FD if he has heard of this.

One drawback I see is that extreme pressure. That would be a concern for hoses bursting and what comes in contact with that stream.
or possibly just tear a hole through the side of the house and damage things in the surroundings.
Adimondin is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 09:13 AM   #10
Cucoulkrory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
I imagine it could be very useful for killing everything in it's path.
Cucoulkrory is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 07:20 PM   #11
DenisMoor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
640
Senior Member
Default
or kill everything in its path but I'm sure it can be put to good use.
DenisMoor is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity