LOGO
USA Politics
USA political debate

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-15-2005, 02:34 AM   #1
mikeydesignzinc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default Bobby Kennedy
Hi all, I’m a huge fan of the intricacies of US politics, and primarily joined this Forum so as to learn more about the ins-and-outs via peoples views. I’m also a huge fan of the late Bobby Kennedy, and being a non-American, was just curious as to what others thought of him?
mikeydesignzinc is offline


Old 12-15-2005, 04:59 AM   #2
milfovoxapl

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
Hello, O huge fan of US politics. You'll probably live to regret it.

Regarding Bobby Kennedy. While it happened 40 years ago, it was an open dynasty in the making. Bobby being appointed US Attorney General was the same as if George Bush appointed his brother Jeb to be Attorney General today. The Kennedys thought they were the equivalent of American Royalty. Any actions like that, if attempted today, would be met with howls that wouldn't quit.

Was it good or bad? Depends on your point of view. We can "What if" until the end of time and get nowhere.

My main problem with the Kennedys, is that they think they are above the average American, and that is not what America is supposed to be about. I think the downfall of the Kennedys was Teddy at Chappaquiddick. He got away with murder, or at least manslaughter, and the country has never forgiven him of that. He has tainted the Kennedy name.

As far as Bobby goes, I think his overly-righteous chasing of organized crime may have been what led to his and his brother executions. The pragmatic solution would have been to take small steps, but the Kennedy ego dictated that he move boldly and openly, therefore guaranteeing his demise.

Ask away. I rarely have no opinion on a subject.
milfovoxapl is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 10:28 PM   #3
BgpOoGI2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
Hello, O huge fan of US politics. You'll probably live to regret it.

Regarding Bobby Kennedy. While it happened 40 years ago, it was an open dynasty in the making. Bobby being appointed US Attorney General was the same as if George Bush appointed his brother Jeb to be Attorney General today. The Kennedys thought they were the equivalent of American Royalty. Any actions like that, if attempted today, would be met with howls that wouldn't quit.

Was it good or bad? Depends on your point of view. We can "What if" until the end of time and get nowhere.

My main problem with the Kennedys, is that they think they are above the average American, and that is not what America is supposed to be about. I think the downfall of the Kennedys was Teddy at Chappaquiddick. He got away with murder, or at least manslaughter, and the country has never forgiven him of that. He has tainted the Kennedy name.

As far as Bobby goes, I think his overly-righteous chasing of organized crime may have been what led to his and his brother executions. The pragmatic solution would have been to take small steps, but the Kennedy ego dictated that he move boldly and openly, therefore guaranteeing his demise.

Ask away. I rarely have no opinion on a subject.
I agree with that 100% righteous asshole he is.
BgpOoGI2 is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 10:47 PM   #4
KellyLynchIV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
The funny thing, is you look at John and Booby's views, tax cuts to stimulate the economy, law-and-order, etc, they would be quite staunch Conservatives in today's world.
KellyLynchIV is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 10:51 PM   #5
OWDavid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
The funny thing, is you look at John and Booby's views, tax cuts to stimulate the economy, law-and-order, etc, they would be quite staunch Conservatives in today's world.
Well you do have a point there Spad. Never looked at it like that though but true. Amazing how time does change.
OWDavid is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 11:01 PM   #6
Biassasecumma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
740
Senior Member
Default
Could you imagine the vilification Barry Goldwater would endure today? Remember AuH²O?
Biassasecumma is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 11:04 PM   #7
hictchewisa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
Could you imagine the vilification Barry Goldwater would endure today? Remember AuH²O?
Barry Goldwater is he still alive?
hictchewisa is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 11:12 PM   #8
spineeupsenry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
I have NO idea. I just find it somewhat revealing that what used to be liberal is now conservative, and today's liberals are yesterday's Socialists and Communists. I AM really over all the college kids that are so full of themselves, thinking they know it all and are so much smarter than everyone else. If they only knew how gullible and stupid they really are.
spineeupsenry is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 11:28 PM   #9
tussinelde

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
311
Senior Member
Default
I have NO idea. I just find it somewhat revealing that what used to be liberal is now conservative, and today's liberals are yesterday's Socialists and Communists. I AM really over all the college kids that are so full of themselves, thinking they know it all and are so much smarter than everyone else. If they only knew how gullible and stupid they really are.
Todays Socialists and Communists are destorying the world.
tussinelde is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 12:49 AM   #10
q9h9pPne

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
I have NO idea. I just find it somewhat revealing that what used to be liberal is now conservative, and today's liberals are yesterday's Socialists and Communists. I AM really over all the college kids that are so full of themselves, thinking they know it all and are so much smarter than everyone else. If they only knew how gullible and stupid they really are.
College kids throughout history have always been like that, I know I was and I presume you were as well. It has something to do with the impatience of youth and assuming that anyone over the age of 25 has sold out to the man. It also has a lot to do with the fact that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. I know when I became politically aware in my teens while living in Europe I made Limbaugh look like a flaming liberal. Then as I grew older and became wiser I became more of a fiscal conservative social moderate, but luckily I didn't loose any of the passion.
q9h9pPne is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 01:14 AM   #11
healty-back

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
I have NO idea. I just find it somewhat revealing that what used to be liberal is now conservative, and today's liberals are yesterday's Socialists and Communists. I AM really over all the college kids that are so full of themselves, thinking they know it all and are so much smarter than everyone else. If they only knew how gullible and stupid they really are.
Just as gullible and stupid as WE were back then. Knowledge doesn't necessarily equal wisdom, but it sure helps to have been around long enough to have seen things change, and then change back again.

Your analysis is right on, with my only argument being that you wouldn't need to go back to the 60's. Many so-called "conservatives" today bear little resemblance to conservatives of just 20 years ago.
healty-back is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 01:24 AM   #12
Vegeinvalge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
There's a saying " The only good Kennedy is a Dead Kennedy." I'm certainly no Kennedy fan, IMO, Pappa Joe made his money bootlegging and his sons spent his fortune chasing skirts and drinking Daddy's Scotch, but I think that RFK and JFK's assassinations were sad days for America.
Vegeinvalge is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 02:04 AM   #13
bomondus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
Right on guys. It's the impatience of youth, although we waited 'til one was 30 before we wouldn't trust them.

The Kennedys are a spoiled rotten rich family. All of their misfortunes have been brought on by themselves, one way or another. They're kind of like a slow motion train wreck. If, and that's a big if, we ever actually know what happened to cause assasinations, I'd put money that they pissed off the wrong people and thought they were above retribution.
bomondus is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 06:49 AM   #14
Piemonedmow

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Right on guys. It's the impatience of youth, although we waited 'til one was 30 before we wouldn't trust them.

The Kennedys are a spoiled rotten rich family. All of their misfortunes have been brought on by themselves, one way or another. They're kind of like a slow motion train wreck. If, and that's a big if, we ever actually know what happened to cause assasinations, I'd put money that they pissed off the wrong people and thought they were above retribution.
As opposed to the rest of the spoilt, rich politicians in the US? 11 of the current serving Senators have either followed their parent of spouse into that office. Errr, hello Mr President? Wasn’t your father one too? Perhaps people need to remember what the War of Independence was actually fought for, as it seems that the US is desperately trying to recreate dynastic and monarchical rule – all current evidence proves this point.
Piemonedmow is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 06:59 AM   #15
Oppofeescom

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
I thought you asked about the Kennedys, not initiating a Bush-bash.
Oppofeescom is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 07:32 AM   #16
Thorwaywhobia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Someone wrote earlier that the Kennedy's think of themselves as being above most Americans. I just don't believe that to be true. In their actions on matters of policy that argument doesn't hold up either. They stood for the environment, for raising the minimum wage, for creating a ladder so that all Americans could benefit. Were they brighter than most? Yes. I think the difference between the Kennedy's and the Bush's is that the Bush's represent only those who put them in power, while the Kennedy's have historically represented everyone.

Besides, when it comes to leading the country, I would prefer a candidate who is "above" me. And what I mean by that is that I would want a president to be like the people, but at the same time, a notch above us in their thinking and reasoning. That's what makes us look up to the good ones, right?
Thorwaywhobia is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 06:29 PM   #17
Zzvukttz

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
If you believe any of that horseshit about them, you have been hopelessly brainwashed, and I'm not even going to wade into the pasture.
Zzvukttz is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 06:58 PM   #18
G8whlTAe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Someone wrote earlier that the Kennedy's think of themselves as being above most Americans. I just don't believe that to be true. In their actions on matters of policy that argument doesn't hold up either. They stood for the environment, for raising the minimum wage, for creating a ladder so that all Americans could benefit. Were they brighter than most? Yes. I think the difference between the Kennedy's and the Bush's is that the Bush's represent only those who put them in power, while the Kennedy's have historically represented everyone.

Besides, when it comes to leading the country, I would prefer a candidate who is "above" me. And what I mean by that is that I would want a president to be like the people, but at the same time, a notch above us in their thinking and reasoning. That's what makes us look up to the good ones, right?
The Kennedys were classic limosine liberals. They talked integration while they sent their kids to white private schools. They were hypocrites of the highest order. They thought that they were above the law and above all standards of behavior. Teddy cheated in Harvard and got kicked out. His Daddy gave Harvard a new library and he was reinstated. JFK was so incompetent that he managed to get a PT Boat, the fastest vessel in the Navy during WWII, cut in half by a slow-moving Japanese Destroyer. That incompetence got him medals and a guaranteed career in politics. RFK appeared to be the only one who wasn't a screw up, but he was a skirt-chaser like his brothers. An amazing feat given the fact that he and Ethel had 11 kids of their own.
G8whlTAe is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 10:49 PM   #19
oxinsnepe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
The Kennedys were classic limosine liberals. They talked integration while they sent their kids to white private schools. They were hypocrites of the highest order. They thought that they were above the law and above all standards of behavior. Teddy cheated in Harvard and got kicked out. His Daddy gave Harvard a new library and he was reinstated. JFK was so incompetent that he managed to get a PT Boat, the fastest vessel in the Navy during WWII, cut in half by a slow-moving Japanese Destroyer. That incompetence got him medals and a guaranteed career in politics. RFK appeared to be the only one who wasn't a screw up, but he was a skirt-chaser like his brothers. An amazing feat given the fact that he and Ethel had 11 kids of their own.
Ethel like to breed so what is wrong with that?
oxinsnepe is offline


Old 12-17-2005, 11:14 PM   #20
dhYTvlAv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
Ethel like to breed so what is wrong with that?
Ever see the famous Groucho Marx "You bet your life" reparte with the man who had a bunch of kids? When asked why he had so many kids, he replied " because I love my wife". Marx replied " I love my cigar, too, but I take it out of my mouth once in a while."
dhYTvlAv is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity