USA Politics ![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Michael's Moore's account in Fahrenheit 9/11 may have been 'dead on' to you, but it was 'dead on' with many half-truths, and that claim is easily substantiated. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
why wasn't he cast as "Fat Bastard" ??????????? Now as for you're tag on the 70 billion illegals are costing taxpayer's. That is misleading to say the least. 70% of the growth in the U.S. is do to illegal migration. In the U.S. $60 billion dollars are earned by illegal aliens each year. As for the medical, and welfare they have come to depend on, that's another story. Want to end that, end SS. Problem solved. |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
I've seen it all. You're not going to show me anything new. All of it still stands and has not been refuted. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
I think I would hardly call Michael Moore's work unrefuted and still standing .. Michael Moore is leftist filmmaker and satirist .. if you're suggesting that his bias is not evident in his books and "documentaries," then you are right, you will never see anything new, only the same-old leftists talking points. Plus Rush is a heckuva lot more honest than Moore is, plus he's not a fat pig like Moore. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Exactly. Moore's videos are no more "documentaries" than Rush Limbaugh's daily audio messages are "documentaries". |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Michael Moore's account in F 9/11 was dead on. He hates Bush and wants him out. I agree. So what if he hates Bush? Anyone who isn't an arswipe Jewdas hates Bush. F 9/11 has never been debunked. I've seen those websites that claim they do, but never refutation of core facts. Always a semantic or a technicality, I know I live in a glass house, but you misspelled semitic. Your spelling of "technicality" is so badly butchered, I have no idea what word you mean. It's not even close to "faggot." He needed a military occupation to control the oil. Liberals and neocons, two sides of the same idiotic coin. The US will not get control of the oil any more than the US controlled the oil under Saddam. All the US gets is dead bodies, loss of world respect, higher gas prices, and higher taxes in the future. The US did not attack Iraq for oil. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
The lying chickensh1t never once mentioned the Jew Israel in his pseudo-documentary. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
Just think - the fat lying pig Moore cranked out his "documentaries", and the Libs dutifully lined up at their neighborhood theatres to part with their money and give it to Moore, so he would allow them to view his "documentaries".
Then Moore took his proceeds and purchased Haliburton stock for himself. Imagine what it must feel like, being a Lib who hates Haliburton, knowing that your money was ultimately used by Moore to purchase Haliburton stock. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
Just think - the fat lying pig Moore cranked out his "documentaries", and the Libs dutifully lined up at their neighborhood theatres to part with their money and give it to Moore, so he would allow them to view his "documentaries". |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
He doesn't own Halliburton stock. Please shut up about it. "Also on Moore's investment menu: defense contractors Honeywell, Boeing and Loral." Like I said, Moore took the Libs' money when they stood in line to see his "documentaries", then he used that money he got from those Libs to purchase Halliburton stock. Turned a tidy little profit buying and selling Halliburton stock for himself, too! Way to go, Libs...... |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
Like I said, Moore took the Libs' money when they stood in line to see his "documentaries", then he used that money he got from those Libs to purchase Halliburton stock. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
Though I dislike Moore, I also dislike lies from either side. According to the picture below, Moore (or his foundation) owned stock in several different companies, one being Halliburton. If this is true, why hasn't someone posted the WHOLE page and not just a part of it on the book? I'll have to reserve judgment on Moore (this issue, anyway) until more proof is submitted.
![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|