[MizzDaizzy]

Until someone finds a case that the 4th ammedment has been violated (which has not happened as of yet), then why keep bringing up the argument as though it is valid?

Weakness.

Actually there was a USSC case that essentially indicated the 4th Ammendment applied to just this kind of issue.l Look up Katz V. US. As far as the argujment you make, let us look at who has been surveiled then we can decide whether there is a case or not. However since the governmnet is keeping that secret I am forced to go by news accounts and they seem to imply US persons have been surveiled within the US, which is clearly a 4th Ammendment issue.