[TypeTeasiaDer]

Don't get me wrong here; I understand the wiretaps and why they must be done. HOWEVER, I have serious problems with this whole scenario:

"Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so."

-George W. Bush
Buffalo, New York
April 2004

I HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM WHERE HE SAYS SPECIFICALLY HE WILL ABIDE BY THE LAW AND THEN A YEAR LATER ADMITS TO ILLEGALLY WIRETAPPING WITHOUT WARRANTS.

NOBODY IS AGAINST THE LAW, AND THAT INCLUDES THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. HE IS NOT A KING. HE MUST ABIDE BY THE LAW AND IF HE WANTS TO GET WARRANTS TO WIRETAP, FINE. IT CAN BE DONE IN LESS THAN 10 SECONDS. BUT NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW, AND GEORGE W. BUSH NEEDS TO BE PUT IN HIS PLACE.

And again, you are speaking from a viewpoint of ignorance. You do not know anything about how this program runs. So how can you claim it is illegal? What raitional do you have?

PS - CAPITALZING ENTIRE SENTENCES IS CONSIDERED YELLING AND IS AGAINT THE RULES