USA Politics ![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
That's great. None of them were shot.
People watch too many movies and television programs and fail to realize that they are not "serving and protecting" by shooting bystanders. Nobody hears of the cop who stopped the guy w/o firing. All we hear about are things like this, so we start to think it is normal. Like I said. What they did was not criminal or even cause for rebuke, but it was NOT a good takedown. They frightened the perp by calling his name when they were too far away, ran towards him, g ot him to draw and then they let loose. How many did the perp actually fire? The original story had the cops "chasing him down the street as he pulled his gun and fired around him", now it looks like he did not even get off a shot.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
The try and train them to react as well as possible. You can't train away adreneline. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
C'mon, anecdotal evidence notwithstanding, it even has a Wiki page.
And anonymous people on a forum are a poor example. Anyone can say they're a cop. This is somewhat old information, but an uncle of mine was a detective, told me that cops don't get enough training and follow-up in marksmanship. That was in the 90s; with lower crime it's probably gotten worse. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
I've heard (read) them doing just that. The seem to have no trouble doing it, especially when the subjects are cops from other departments/areas, and it's nothing official. If you did, you would know you were spouting cow pies right now. Most groups do not bad mouth one another like that (well, Engineers do, but we are the exception... ![]() Zip: One thing I would like for the men entrusted with carrying lethal instruments of enforcement with them on the streets is the ability to hit what they are aiming at. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|