LOGO
USA Politics
USA political debate

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-08-2010, 06:45 PM   #1
viagsjicguara

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
It is admittedly emotional and difficult to quantify. Give me some time; I'll develop a more thoughtful response than I could at this very moment.
viagsjicguara is offline


Old 03-09-2010, 05:30 AM   #2
uMG6uOSo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
Careful. When a stance is formulated from an emotional base, it is rarely logically validatated.

Try and track down what your feeling is, and where it might really be coming from. look for common threads. the whole idea that somehow Obama is this radical liberal is so staged it is not funny.

If he has one major fault, it is trying to make everyone happy. OTOH, it is nice to have someone in office that is not concerned with ramming things through with a majority.


The only problem with that is you have a tendency to end up with a cup of vanilla ice cream with 47 different toppings. (which sounds fine until you get to the capers).
uMG6uOSo is offline


Old 03-09-2010, 11:40 AM   #3
mas-dkt-sive

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
You can’t do without words for things; it’s the only way you can talk.
What . I wasn't suggesting otherwise .
mas-dkt-sive is offline


Old 03-09-2010, 01:57 PM   #4
Gometesstem

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Sorry, I was referring to what you had called "terminology."

I can see I was unclear; bad terminology.
Gometesstem is offline


Old 03-09-2010, 02:01 PM   #5
derty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
647
Senior Member
Default
Yes, sarcasm aside, my point .
derty is offline


Old 03-09-2010, 11:57 PM   #6
vernotixas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
514
Senior Member
Default
You could say the rich make jobs for the poor, and the poor make wealth for the rich. To get really rich, it helps to have those minimum-wagers.
Well, obviously minimum-wagers are important but some people need to control their spending too, ...
vernotixas is offline


Old 03-10-2010, 12:09 AM   #7
fujitsusi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Fox News is Conservative, so I'm going with Liberal.

That wasn't so hard.
fujitsusi is offline


Old 03-10-2010, 12:44 AM   #8
Seeseeskeva

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
Modern Liberalism = Communism/Socialism
Conservatism/Right-Wing = Fascism

Both roads lead to an increase in the power/size of Government and a decrease in Personal Freedom/Liberty. A catch-22, A dilemma: fortunately there is a better way to go.

The poll is a false dichotomy so I will abstain from voting: but much can be learned by the responses it generates.
Seeseeskeva is offline


Old 03-10-2010, 01:11 AM   #9
paratayoma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Fox News is Conservative, so I'm going with Liberal.

That wasn't so hard.
You mean you didn't have to agonize?

... fortunately there is a better way to go.
Well, let's hear it.

... much can be learned by the responses it generates.
I agree ... but I wish I'd learned more from yours.
paratayoma is offline


Old 03-10-2010, 01:12 AM   #10
emuffette

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
Conservatism/Right-Wing = Fascism

^ historically incorrect.
emuffette is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity