Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
http://www.drugwarmemes.com/
Seriously, the kike assholes who created this site aren't smart or clever. They are destroying and undermining this country with their shitty pro-drug rhetoric. I think America has had enough of it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
![]() What gets me is how right-wingers cannot see the forest for the trees when it comes to drugs, abortion, and other things they don't like... but get it when it comes to guns. Illegalizing guns won't stop criminals from getting them, all the same the drug war has hardly stopped drug procurement. If anything made it worse, and by design. The drug cartel is in cahoots with the prison industrial complex to keep 30% of the population behind bars. That's 30% that cannot vote, and work for free. Why wouldn't they continue the drug war? But if you wanted to reduce drug use... you'd legalize it. Because legal drugs would mean that you wouldn't have to rely on the criminal element to obtain it, meaning you're not surrounded by criminal minds... it would mean you can tax and regulate it, (Which social conservatives have forgotten is a valid tactic) reform works better then prohibition. Look at alcohol and tobacco. They're taxed and regulated to all hell... and nobody is throwing a riot, there isn't a huge crime circuit for moonshine and unregulated tobacco... though there should be as tight as the leash is on it. But people will accept just about any kind of bullshit. Which is precisely why you have to stop "reasoning" with others, and just fucking focus on getting it done. Organizing, planning, and working toward a political goal. Regardless of what the idiot goyim have to say. Clearly the corporate tycoons who have politicians on payroll are not simply smarter then you, but more willing to try and be smart. Because how hard is it to realize this simple truth? You don't like drugs? Tax them, regulate them, convince the people they can have drugs... just with a stipulation. It always works. If the left/right were serious, and not just working for lobbyists... they would have done this to their respective issues a long time ago. But NARAL would never let abortions getting taxed to death, and the NRA would never let another gun reglation pass the lips of a politician. This is why all these pro-hemp people need to consider their wording and what exactly it is they're after. I'd argue decriminalization of drugs, not legalization. Legal means they can tax/regulate it. Decriminalize means it's simply not a criminal offense to be caught with possession or usage. If you can change the law to that, or even just like a seatbelt law where you cannot be charged with drug possession unless it's with another charge first... then you've already won half the battle. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
http://www.drugwarmemes.com/ Why don't you just cheer up for once? |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|